๐๐ผ๐ป๐ป๐ผ๐น๐น๐โ๐ ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐ป๐ฒ๐ฟ - this week: Molly Bloom's Monologue - Kele Fleming
- Charles Connolly

- Oct 21
- 10 min read
Welcome all to ๐๐ผ๐ป๐ป๐ผ๐น๐น๐โ๐ ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐ป๐ฒ๐ฟ, a series of weekly reviews by Charles Connollyย - an artist in his own right. Here, Charles delves into the greatest brand new singles brought to you by the best unsigned artists on our electrifying and eclectic set of ๐๐๐ฌ ๐ผ๐ง๐ฉ๐๐จ๐ฉ ๐๐ฅ๐ค๐ฉ๐ก๐๐๐๐ฉ playlists.
๐๐ค๐ก๐ก๐ฎ ๐ฝ๐ก๐ค๐ค๐ข'๐จ ๐๐ค๐ฃ๐ค๐ก๐ค๐๐ช๐ - ๐๐๐ก๐ ๐๐ก๐๐ข๐๐ฃ๐
Charles isnโt yet brave enoughโฆ
Hands Up whoโs sick to death of Spotifyโฆ? Who is absolutely fed up with everything it has become in recent years? The way it is less a music listening platform, and more a social media platformโฆ? Oh, but it goes so much deeper than that. It ainโt just an ugly interface. Sorry, you can all put your hands down now; I saw โy'allโ. Spotify has become a fully-fledged greed machine. It has no scruples or morals of any kind. It does not care about a single artist. It does not care about the music industry. It does not care about music. It is (only recently) trying to look like it is doing something about HAL (A.I.) - but even that is all a ruse. It is widely known (though not officially proven) that Spotify is not only adding HAL music to its own editorial playlists, but actually making fully HAL playlists, to the extent that there isn't a single human-made track on such playlists (again, not proven, but known). Spotify has been punishing innocent independent artists for quite a while now, having whole artist catalogues removed due to one song unknowingly having been placed on a rogue bot-playlist (a playlist that is streamed automatically by robots in order to accrue streaming royalties). The artist did nothing here. And Spotify gives no warning. Because Spotify too is run by robots. Everything is automatic, and humans have little or nothing to do with its running. This is art, baby! And what about royalties? What does the artist get in return for someone listening to their song once? Let's just say it would take about 300 plays of that song to buy the artist a Mars bar. So, not very much.
Daniel Ek has recently announced that he is stepping down as CEO of Spotify (woo-hoo!), but staying as the executive chair (ugh). Going by most executive chairs I have tried out over the years, I'm sure he'll be most comfortable. As to whether he'll be able to stand the weight of artists' rear ends pressing up against him, it is yet to be seen. But this news of him โstepping downโ comes just months after it was announced that he is investing $694 million in A.I. military defence... Hmmm... This doesn't seem very arty to me. And yet we all continue to stick our music on his music streaming service... Why? Because Spotify is by far the most popular music streaming platform in the world. And why is THAT...? Because there is a free option. A free tier. The only known service that offers a free version. Sadly, most people in this modern world would rather save a few pounds/dollars/yen than have a bit of quality. The free tier means having very low quality playback, tracks in random order, and of course, adverts - what feels like - every few minutes. Let me remind you of how things used to be. More than 25 years ago, we left the house in order to go and buy a record. One CD would cost anywhere from ยฃ10 to as much as ยฃ17 in London in 1997. And that was at a time when everything was SO much cheaper than it is now. And yet people still did it. It was simply understood that this was how much music cost. There was genuinely a living to be made in music, and listeners respected this. But now, we have not only greed in the the streaming companies, but greed and disrespect in many of the listeners who refuse to pay even as little as ยฃ11 a month (ยฃ12 for Spotify) for unlimited music in perfect quality. Literally, almost any piece of music ever recorded, at your fingertips and earlobes. Yet most opt for the free tier. Itโs enough to reduce you to tiers.
I say โalmostโ any piece of music, because on Spotify it is starting to trickle away. Two reasons. One: independent art is being thrown out like dirty dishwater, all because of so-called โfraudulent streamsโ, about which the artist knows absolutely nothing. But Two: oh, this is much more prescient. It isn't being forced upon the poor artist at all. It is by their own hand. There are now artists so furious with everything to do with Spotify, that they are removing their own music from the platform. Literal boycott. Of course, though, this sort of gesture and movement can only be rendered by those high up on the food chain. Those who have other avenues to explore in order to earn money from their music... Basically, the stars. Take Taylor Swift, for example. She is not entirely unknown. Quite the little starlet, in fact. In 2014, she removed all her music from Spotify. Big publicity. โBut I donโt understand. All her music is on Spotify!โ - Thatโs because she had it all put back there 3 years later. More publicity. Quite the stanceโฆ Proof that it was just a clever marketing ploy. In the age of streaming, her millions of fans had to either shift platforms or buy all of her music, only to then realise that it wasnโt any good. Sorry, only to realise that it was soon enough all back on Spotify again. Were her fans sick of being used? Well, Taylorโs next plan was to stick it to her record label by becoming her own person, freed from the ties of big business. Which meant releasing all of her albums again (Taylorโs Version). Apparently millions wasnโt enough. The poor obsessive fans needed to buy more duplicatesโฆ With Spotify she said she was taking a stance. With her own re-releases she said she was taking a stance. Okay, none of this is really taking a stance. This is greed and publicity. Mainstream artists might โonlyโ get a much smaller percentage of the royalties than we independent artists get, but the percentage is irrelevant. I am sure I could live very comfortably on 1% of the royalties from her least popular song. You see, a percentage is a meaningless figure without estimating the rough total income in the first place. So yeah: stars, ehโฆ? Theyโre just as bad as the CEOs. And these stars are the only ones able to be so bold as to remove their music from the most popular music streaming service in the world. At least that's what EYE thought... Until now.
Iโm sure most of you know Canadian extraordinaire, Kele Fleming. Sheโs a fabulous artist I have reviewed three times in the past. Have you played her music recently on Spotify? If you say yes, youโre lying. Have you TRIED playing her music on Spotify recently? If you have, youโll know that it ainโt there. Well, it MOSTLY ainโt there, anywayโฆ You see, Kele Fleming has plucked up the courage to do what so many artists have wanted to do, but havenโt had the guts to follow through and actually do. She has removed her music from the platform. Itโs done! But sheโs gone one step further. And this step for me is what makes Kele truly admirable in SO many ways. It is bold, it is brave, and it is downright cool and exceedingly clever. Kele released one final track on Spotify, called โCricketsโ. The title is absolutely inspired. It is a monologue of sorts. All spoken word. But while not being poetry, thereโs poetry here. It is an explanation to all her fans about what she is doing and why she is doing it. It is an advert for how to find her on other platforms and listening methods. It is a true STAND. While I do wish this was Keleโs idea (I wonโt hide that fact), I admire her for telling us where she got the idea from (Laura Bird of the Mynabirds). It instils trust in an artist when they themselves admit things like this โlive on airโ. She is not hiding the fact that she was inspired by someone else. Keleโs reasons remain the same, and they remain her own. The thing is, what struck me the most when listening to this for the first time (yes, Iโve listened multiple times), was the professionalism of the piece as a whole. It isnโt just a voice memo hastily recorded on a phone. Itโs a 5-minute piece of art! The voice is crisp and balanced. There is a well written script. The pacing is spot on; not rushed or laboured. But it also has sound effects and music! A lot of this was done using her MicroFreak synth to such great effect. And all mixed to perfection by her fabulous ongoing sound engineer, Sheldon Zaharko. But itโs those words of hers that strike with such confident ease. You will be struck, just a warning. Correction: you will be moved and slightly chilled. You see, although Keleโs music is still available on all other streaming platforms (for now), she is not a fan of โstreamingโ. While you can still play all her music on Apple Music - with which she also has problems (valid reasons) - and any of the other streaming services, she admits her thoughts that streaming as a concept should never have existed. And I know what she means. But, like HAL, once itโs here, thereโs no killing it. Which is why we all use it.
What Kele REALLY wants, though, is fair earnings for artists. And I donโt think ANY of us can argue with that! This isnโt greed in the slightest; this is economic balance! Which is why her ACTUAL latest single (released around a week before โCricketsโ) is available on Keleโs Patreon and Bandcamp pages. Of course, it is also available on all other streaming platforms (that pay the artist far more than Spotify ever did). Letโs look into the REAL music. Please welcome Kele Fleming with her latest release, โMolly Bloomโs Monologueโ!!! But donโt worry, this oneโs not actually a monologue. Oh, the irony. Does Molly Bloom ring a bell to any of you? No, not the celebrity. Iโm talking about James Joyceโs โUlyssesโ. โMolly Bloomโs Soliloquyโ is the final part of the mega-read, where Molly reflects and brings to light her most inner thoughts and feelings. I canโt help but see a connection between โMolly Bloomโs Monologueโ and โCricketsโโฆ And Iโm starting to feel like Kele Fleming is perhaps the reincarnation of Molly Bloom. The difference being, Kele Fleming is a fabulous singer, writer and musician. Let me just state that I think this latest single from Kele is one of the very best tracks to have come from any member of the New Artist Spotlight this year. It is unique and truly exciting. And today, we are going to be playing it loud and proud!
โMolly Bloomโs Monologueโ was written in the early 90s. Itโs a song that concentrates on the injustice of the world. While it may have been written over 30 years ago, it is still as relevant now as it ever was. Perhaps even more so. We are all fighting far more than we were in the early 90s. Things have become more serious. At least back then, we had our music. Artists had their art. Artists earned their money! Fred Astaire once sang โThey Canโt Take That Away From Meโโฆ Sadly, he was wrong. They bloody well can, and they bloody well have. But letโs simmer down and think musically. We start with a chorused electric guitar strum. It is somehow a little naked. Partly because it is only one chord, but mainly because it is only the lonely. That is, until Kele/Molly joins in with few tattered rags (for the rest is worn away). A voice that seems as though it is only here to serve, with malnourished arms. But as the whole band joins forces (โa bitter pill we swallowโ), the confidence of a backlash is apparent. Itโs as though she has been hushed up for so long, she can barely remember or realise how it was ever supposed to be. But at this moment, it is like she has been faced with just two words: โTell meโ. And so she does. Kele explains. She gives us her innermost feelings. At times, her โsistersโ (her own backing vocals) join her in attempting to hold her spirits high. They are the sweetest creatures. But after a while of recent gruelling memories, we open up into double-time and blast into โYour flesh is just a little too SHALLOWโ!! Itโs exhilarating. Like running through a storm, in tears but helplessly laughing, and all the while limitlessly determined to keep going. But all calms down, as even the bravest need to breathe. At all times, each instrument is playing the only thing it could be playing. Everything is perfect. The snareโs backbeat is integral to the entire track whether it be the slow verses or the double-time choruses. The bass is so musical and melodic, it could easily be played by McCartney or Sting, while the guitars are simply refined. They know when to do the right thing, and realise the answer is: always. Keleโs singing voice is incredibly versatile, and frankly absolutely stunning. From the angelic backing vocals to the iron strength of the lead in the chorus, she hits it all with confident precision FULL of heart. Thank you, Kele, for such a refreshing song, and for a further dose of extra wow on Spotify!
Kele is so brave, and so daring. It is THIS that I miss in music these days. That and utterly original music! You want to listen to โMolly Bloomโs Monologueโ on YouTube? Perhaps donโt. Use another streaming service (like Apple Music). Orโฆ HEREโS her Bandcamp page where you can listen to all her music. But better still, why not support her by BUYING the music on the same page? Should you feel that after having read all this, you really donโt want to use Spotify in order to listen to โCricketsโ, you can hear it HERE on Keleโs Patreon page. Feel free to browse around while youโre there - thereโs a lot of interesting stuff. Or, you can just listen to it on Spotify. I couldnโt decide if it was a good idea or a bad idea to send you to Spotify, so Iโm leaving it up to you, the listener. Itโs your call. If you choose not to continue following the career and music of Kele Fleming, then you're going to be sorely missing out. Follow the artist, not the platform.
3 things for you all: Donโt be greedy. Stay true to your word. And be kind.
There are now SO MANY streaming platforms to choose from, but by far the most popular are Spotify and Apple Music. Whichever you choose, it's a tale of two shitties. But some animals are more shitty than others.
Listen to ๐พ๐ง๐๐๐ ๐๐ฉ๐จ on the ๐๐ผ๐ป๐ป๐ผ๐น๐น๐โ๐ ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐ป๐ฒ๐ฟ Spotify playlist HERE!
Listen to ๐๐ค๐ก๐ก๐ฎ ๐ฝ๐ก๐ค๐ค๐ข'๐จ ๐๐ค๐ฃ๐ค๐ก๐ค๐๐ช๐ on the ๐๐ผ๐ป๐ป๐ผ๐น๐น๐โ๐ ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐ป๐ฒ๐ฟ Apple Music playlist HERE!
Follow ๐๐๐ก๐ ๐๐ก๐๐ข๐๐ฃ๐ on Instagram HERE!
Please share this post and let me know your thoughts in the comments below









I stopped giving Spotify ANY money about 6 months ago - after becoming very disillusioned with the way they treat artists. I'm not sure that withdrawing my music would achieve much in the scheme of things - beyond a feeling of self satisfaction and [in a moral sense] zen. I also wonder, though, if it might bring my short artist career to an abrupt halt. It is TRICKY! So, hats off to you, Kele. And thank you CC for another great review.
I've been tempted to leave Spotify for a long time now. I'm annoyed by their attitude of blaming artists who unknowingly find themselves on a BOT playlist. Just two days ago, I received a huge spike in streams, but none of my songs were voluntarily added to those playlists.
It shouldn't be possible for someone who doesn't create music and doesn't really care about the music world to be the one who controls the most popular streaming service today, only concerned about the money it generates without genuinely supporting the work of all the artists who truly create music in the world and who must speak out against the injustice that continues to keep them in the game and sink many independent and real artists in the world.
Je comprend tellement ce sujet. Il y a quelques annรฉes j'avais quittรฉ spotify, pour finalement y revenir, mais je ne suis toujours pas convaincu de mon choix ;-) Trรจs bonne chanson et critique !! Bravo ร tous les deux.
Such a beautiful piece of music for you to review! I always love Kele and how true she is to herself. She is an amazing artist and one of a kind. Taking your music off of Spotify and still being successful proves that. This song is fantastic and itโs no wonder it doesnโt need Spotifyโs help to get it out there. Thanks again Charles for reviewing a great song!