Connolly’s Corner

  • ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐˜†โ€™๐˜€ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ – this week: You Wrote a Song – Unobliterated

    ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐˜†โ€™๐˜€ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ – this week: You Wrote a Song – Unobliterated

    Welcome all to ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐˜†โ€™๐˜€ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ, a series of weekly reviews by Charles Connolly – an artist in his own right. Here, Charles delves into the greatest brand new singles brought to you by the best unsigned artists on our electrifying and eclectic set of ๐™‰๐™š๐™ฌ ๐˜ผ๐™ง๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™จ๐™ฉ ๐™Ž๐™ฅ๐™ค๐™ฉ๐™ก๐™ž๐™œ๐™๐™ฉ playlists.

    ๐™”๐™ค๐™ช ๐™’๐™ง๐™ค๐™ฉ๐™š ๐™– ๐™Ž๐™ค๐™ฃ๐™œ – ๐™๐™ฃ๐™ค๐™—๐™ก๐™ž๐™ฉ๐™š๐™ง๐™–๐™ฉ๐™š๐™™

    Charles oils those cogsโ€ฆ

    Feeling a bit fat lately? Breathing a little heavier than usual? Don’t worry, this is quite normal these days. But it didn’t used to be. Take a look at old photos of anyone under the age of 50 or 60, and they were probably pretty slim. This was the old norm. They ate fresh food and had a balanced diet. Sweet treats were a rare treat – hence the name. In order to buy said fresh food, one had to wander up (or down) the road to the shops (yes, plural) and buy it. It would then be transported via one’s arms and legs (also plural). Arms for to carry; legs for to schlep. These days, food is rather less nutritious, and there are far too many unhealthy options to guide your eyes into temptation. The double schlep is usually achieved pretty much limbless. Vroom there; vroom back. And like a deadweight we wind the sofa with a central blow once back in the homestead; legs outstretched and arms a-flailin’. And yes, you pant with much perspiration. Or perhaps you donโ€™t like the idea of driving all the way there and all the way back, while sweating like a jogger from having moved several inchesโ€ฆ Thereโ€™s always Uber Eats! Eats by apps (these gluttonous plurals). Okay, so at least we all have the fittest thumbs these daysโ€ฆ But is it any wonder that weโ€™re perhaps less physically fit than we used to be? For the most part, I call it stubborn laziness. The good news is, people seem to be becoming aware of their physical slump, and so are starting to do something about it.

    The bad news is, it seems people are mostly ONLY aware of the physical side. Oh, and good old mental (un)health (stress, anxiety, depression etc.). But there is more to our noggin than what we call โ€œmental healthโ€โ€ฆ Have you noticed lately that your brain is on autopilot? That for the majority of the time it is spent twiddling its neurones, wondering whether it will be needed at any time soon? Are we perhaps getting just a tad too lazy…? Do you remember when you were young (wait, I havenโ€™t finished), being in awe of older peopleโ€™s knowledge, views and wisdom? I certainly do. These older people werenโ€™t just full of facts, but they seemed so quick-witted. There were layers to their knowledge, and they could respond with witty profundity. But what do WE do these days? We sit in stumped silence, hunched over a small Google machine; we get โ€œthe answerโ€ then discard said information within seconds, with the full knowledge (oh, the irony) that it can always be accessed via said little device at a later date. Simply put, our brains have largely become superfluous. I believe this all began with the pocket calculator in the โ€˜70s. Maths (yes, we pluralise it in England) was suddenly seen by the young as a pointless subject; a needless and laborious waste of time. And to some extent, I see what they meant. But I wouldnโ€™t be comfortable if I couldnโ€™t do the simplest sum without the use of a machine. I would feel a little pointless. And so the mental (un)health aspect starts to creep in. There is such a direct link between the brain and the mind (hear me out, I know most of you think of them as the same thing), that one will very much affect the other. The brain is the internal machine that does the work, and it is required in order to feed the mind with much needed nutrition (instant vibes). Simply put, using oneโ€™s brain will make you feel good.

    Alongside laze-inducing machines telling us โ€œthe answerโ€, comes another problem. A problem that has been going on long before technology started helping us on our โ€œmerryโ€ way. We are so absurdly susceptible to suggestion. Although this has been a thing for (probably) millennia, I have noticed the soaring rise of โ€œwait to hear what everyone else says before blurting out my own identical philosophyโ€. This neednโ€™t be something so huge as your opinion on world politics, but even something so trivial as your thoughts on a certain wine. If youโ€™ve read the โ€œtasting notesโ€ on the back of the bottle, chances are you will have identical conclusions as to it being full-bodied, containing mild tannins (regardless of not quite knowing what a tannin is) and finishing with notes of cherry and chocolate. We are very much creatures of suggestion (to the advertising industryโ€™s glee). What might be a better โ€œgameโ€, is to taste first, then read after; then you can see if you agree. Youโ€™ll feel better, I promise you! But that could be the effect of the wine (hic!). In the words of The Beatles, โ€˜Think For Yourselfโ€™. Self-achievement is one of the biggest mental health boosters. In relying on machines and other peopleโ€™s minds, there is little to no satisfaction. Which could explain that while I was making that โ€˜Hands Up!โ€™ album 18 trillion years ago, I was on a high; and while not really making anything of my own right now, I am on a bit of a slump. Having said that, do you know how EYE exercise my brain? By observing and pondering, and by writing these weekly articles. The better the writing, the better I feel.

    But what does any of this have to do with โ€˜You Wrote a Songโ€™ by Unobliterated?? Iโ€™ll get to that in a bit. For now, allow me to welcome Gary Taylor to my Corner, for he is the entirety of Unobliterated. Before we delve into the songโ€™s meaning, letโ€™s cover some other stuff first. Soโ€ฆ Who is Gary Taylor? Heโ€™s a full-frontal nudist. Ahem. What I mean to say is, he is bold and brave, makes sure you sit up and take note, and often has the guts to say what others would only dare to think. His clothes are in place, rest assured. Although living in Portugal with his family, he made sure to hold on to his English roots by way of a dry, sarcastic (sometimes even scathing) sense of humour – Iโ€™m sure you arenโ€™t surprised to hear that this sits well with me, while it might give some others a funny turn. Itโ€™s an English quirk, just like other nations having their own quirks. And what has Unobliterated been up to lately? He wrote a song. A song called โ€˜You Wrote a Songโ€™. Now we get to the songโ€™s meaning? No, no; not yetโ€ฆ

    Musically, Unobliterated is a master of disguised clever chords and chord changes. With most of his music you might find yourself rocking away (in a nodding fashion), completely oblivious to anything particularly brilliant going on. But believe me, this subtle brilliance is the reason you havenโ€™t got bored and skipped. It isnโ€™t jazzy; it doesnโ€™t ever feel awkward; itโ€™s what I have always attempted to do in my own music. To sound simple, while actually being rather more. The song starts straight in with oomph and dissonance. A welcome dissonance. Itโ€™s creepy, but it suggests somethingโ€™s coming, thus holding your attention. The almost indecipherable lyrics are pivoting between dissonance and โ€œhome turfโ€. Interestingly, those lyrics that are difficult to pick up are exactly what make you pay closer attention. This isnโ€™t a mixing error, but the genuine intention. Robotic confusion, if you will. Then comes the setup of all setups – a two-bar drum fill – as we sink into a โ€œmore pleasurableโ€ verseโ€ฆ But it isnโ€™t a verse. Itโ€™s a full chorus, followed by a verse. Which also sounds a bit chorus-like. The whole piece has such an unusual structure, which is – ugh – music to my ears! Remind me never to use that phrase when reviewing music. In hindsight, I think Gary – sorry – Unobliterated, has done something unique here, in giving the verse the words of a chorus. Because things seem to actually get more interesting in the other verse. The first verse that follows the chorus – see what I mean? Heโ€™s a crazy mixed up kid who probably knows exactly what heโ€™s doing. I love it when artists are being arty rather than reading the manual dโ€™art. Experimentation and newness!!

    And after all this excitement, do we get more of the sameโ€ฆ? Hah!! I donโ€™t THINK so. This is Unobliterated: king of the bridge! Now, most bridges are how long; 10 seconds? 15 seconds? How longโ€™s his? Try 50 seconds!!! And itโ€™s a three-part bridge too! The first part is what I have come to expect from Unobliterated. Itโ€™s smooth, cool, and takes us down another road. But in part two, that road comes to a bridge (no pun intended), leading us to a new land! We have width, reverbs, delays, and ultimately an ethereal, ambient electronic paradise. I almost expect a deep trance-like kick to take over, but just as you think it might go full electronica, he makes a handbrake turn and careers off into the more familiar Unobliterated sunset for a brief part three. Gary Taylor remains the king of the bridge. There are just SO many moments in this song where I smile and tingle with โ€œohh, that chordโ€ or โ€œahh, that soundโ€, that I wonโ€™t bother to list them. The final 17 seconds show off the most beautiful voice we never knew he had. The tasting notes suggest a finish of Frank Joshua with no hint of tannins (whatever they are).

    Okay, okay. But the songโ€™s meaningโ€ฆ? Letโ€™s ponder on this a bit. I mean, itโ€™s a good question. What IS this song about? But then do you REALLY want me to say my thoughts? Howโ€™s about I donโ€™t say what I think itโ€™s aboutโ€ฆ What do YOU think itโ€™s about? Let me and Gary know in the comments. But if you come to this article a little later than immediately after publication, please donโ€™t rely on other peopleโ€™s comments for โ€œthe answerโ€. Just listen to the song, listen to the lyrics (the lyrics are in the description of the YouTube video – linked below – should you wish to read them), use your own brain and make up your own mind. Life is better this way. We simply NEED to be more independently minded and not rely on othersโ€™ thoughts and views. Be bothered, and write your own mini review in the comments if you wish, but focus on the meaning behind the song. Donโ€™t worry, it doesnโ€™t have to be long by any means (and you donโ€™t have to do it at all!). And also, donโ€™t worry, I wonโ€™t be doing this every week. I heard that sigh of relief. Lazybrains.

    Remember, donโ€™t look at what others have said. I may not mind you guzzling, courtesy of Uber Eats (still plural), but I might have something to say about Uber Cheats (also plural).

    Listen to ๐™”๐™ค๐™ช ๐™’๐™ง๐™ค๐™ฉ๐™š ๐™– ๐™Ž๐™ค๐™ฃ๐™œ on the ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐˜†โ€™๐˜€ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ Spotify playlist HERE!

    Listen to ๐™”๐™ค๐™ช ๐™’๐™ง๐™ค๐™ฉ๐™š ๐™– ๐™Ž๐™ค๐™ฃ๐™œ on the ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐˜†โ€™๐˜€ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ Apple Music playlist HERE!

    Listen to/watch ๐™”๐™ค๐™ช ๐™’๐™ง๐™ค๐™ฉ๐™š ๐™– ๐™Ž๐™ค๐™ฃ๐™œ on YouTube HERE! (lyrics in description here too)

    Follow ๐™๐™ฃ๐™ค๐™—๐™ก๐™ž๐™ฉ๐™š๐™ง๐™–๐™ฉ๐™š๐™™ on Instagram HERE!

    Follow ๐™๐™ฃ๐™ค๐™—๐™ก๐™ž๐™ฉ๐™š๐™ง๐™–๐™ฉ๐™š๐™™ on TwiX HERE!

    Please share this post and let me know your thoughts in the comments below

  • ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐˜†โ€™๐˜€ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ – this week: The Woman Who Doesnโ€™t Exist – Fig Fable, Lubena Nova & Riitala

    ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐˜†โ€™๐˜€ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ – this week: The Woman Who Doesnโ€™t Exist – Fig Fable, Lubena Nova & Riitala

    Welcome all to ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐˜†โ€™๐˜€ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ, a series of weekly reviews by Charles Connolly – an artist in his own right. Here, Charles delves into the greatest brand new singles brought to you by the best unsigned artists on our electrifying and eclectic set of ๐™‰๐™š๐™ฌ ๐˜ผ๐™ง๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™จ๐™ฉ ๐™Ž๐™ฅ๐™ค๐™ฉ๐™ก๐™ž๐™œ๐™๐™ฉ playlists.

    ๐™๐™๐™š ๐™’๐™ค๐™ข๐™–๐™ฃ ๐™’๐™๐™ค ๐˜ฟ๐™ค๐™š๐™จ๐™ฃโ€™๐™ฉ ๐™€๐™ญ๐™ž๐™จ๐™ฉ – ๐™๐™ž๐™œ ๐™๐™–๐™—๐™ก๐™š, ๐™‡๐™ช๐™—๐™š๐™ฃ๐™– ๐™‰๐™ค๐™ซ๐™– & ๐™๐™ž๐™ž๐™ฉ๐™–๐™ก๐™–

    Charles has no identityโ€ฆ

    I’m reading a book about Paul McCartney at the moment. Despite assuming I know pretty much everything there is to know about him and his life, I find myself repeatedly floored by the most fascinating chunks of “Huh, I had no idea about that”. It covers so many aspects of his life and career, from family and friends to his love of literature and old ladies (not to mention younger ones). In some respects his life could never be considered in any way similar to ours. He is in another league. Incomparable. But in other ways, he is very much a normal human being with the same thoughts, feelings, worries and anxieties as all of us. Yes, he has always had that pillow of money to cushion the blow, but he has also had problems that none of us has ever had to deal with. Such as world fame for over 60 years. He is not a complainer in the slightest, but he still needs to deal with things in his own way. With world fame comes pressure. He was never one of those lucky ones who just happened to become famous – like untalented TV presenters. He was famous because of his raw talent. So, as the fame mounted, so did the pressure. Fame and adulation can crash as quickly as it soars. By the end of The Beatles, he was lost, exhausted and scared. He was on his own. But he had Linda. The book often returns to the themes of freedom and escape. His farms in Scotland and Sussex being regular getaways from the persistent nagging press and endless business meetings (he always hated the business side). He would sometimes even travel to Jamaica or Africa to record an album – again, getting away from everything. This frequent escape was probably what kept him sane throughout the decades.

    Thankfully, we donโ€™t have these problems. I could say โ€œmostโ€ of us donโ€™t have these problems, but I think I can safely say that EVERYONE reading these articles has never been famous and knows nothing of the feeling. Many of us, however, might suffer from the complete opposite. Total invisibility – no eyes on you (despite that word containing 5 eyes). The feeling that no one knows and no one cares. A vague, occasional shadow, at best. One who has little to offer, or one who has much to offer but no one pays any attention. The feeling of being a permanent third wheel, surplus to requirements. No mark has been made, and no heads have been turned. Unlike Paulโ€™s โ€œEver Present Pastโ€, oneโ€™s present and past might come across as irrelevant. Or so thatโ€™s what one might think and feel. Weโ€™ve all seen the worldโ€™s little people on social media, attempting to act like big people, with the hope of actually becoming big people (I donโ€™t mean fat). What if โ€œfameโ€ is not the answerโ€ฆ? What if everything is actually fine? What if all this is just an illusion based on oneโ€™s feelings? Are your friends and family actually ignoring you? Have you actually done anything terribly wrong? Have you actually offended anyone? Would you genuinely consider yourself the outcast of society? I would assume the answer for all of these to be No. What is actually most likely the cause of this feeling is arrogance from the other side. Being ignored is usually the fault of the ignorer rather than the ignoree. THEYโ€™RE the ones who need to change. Contrary to the classic break-up line, you should be saying โ€œItโ€™s not me, itโ€™s youโ€. You could of course loudly flaunt your presence and boast your talents, but perhaps what you need is a good dose of pepping up? Or maybe an amalgamation of the twoโ€ฆ

    Weโ€™re always being told we need to โ€œstay relevantโ€. Itโ€™s a phrase so casually tossed around, but surely the alternative suggests we are irrelevantโ€ฆ Arenโ€™t we our own relevance? Shouldnโ€™t we decide what is relevant or not? To โ€œstay relevantโ€ these days seems to say โ€œbe like everyone elseโ€, which to me is the opposite of โ€œrelevanceโ€. Being deliberate and true to oneself, is just about as forthright as one can be. Invisibility (and its 5 eyes) will be a thing of the past, and the right people will find you. Ignore the ignorers. In the words of, well, most people these days, โ€œYer goodโ€. Which brings me neatly into the land of Fig Fable and its members. And what a triumphant land it is! For me, Fig Fable is Lubena Nova and others, because Lubena is the associated member of the community. Sheโ€™s the person I chat with, sheโ€™s the lyricist and melodist, and sheโ€™s the sensational singer. But โ€œand othersโ€ is frankly unfair, so we will be covering everyone involved. Please welcome Fig Fable with their brand new single, โ€˜The Woman Who Doesnโ€™t Existโ€™! Jazz hands at the ready!!

    To say this song is a straightforward pop song, would be a huge lie. โ€˜The Woman Who Doesnโ€™t Existโ€™ (TWWDE from now on) is not pop in the slightest. This is unashamedly jazz. Yes, real jazz. But vocal jazz. We still have song here, but donโ€™t expect lingering chords of C, G, D, Am & Em. And you wonโ€™t hear any chunky riffs progressing the song either. But you will hear edgy vocals. Just not the kind of vocals you have heard elsewhere. I have reviewed the Nova/Riitala duo once before, over a year ago. If you are old enough to remember that, then Lubena Novaโ€™s particular singing voice might be familiar to you. It is unmistakable. If you ARENโ€™t familiar with anything by Nova/Riitala/FigFable, then this might very well blow your mind. NO ONE sounds like them. This is originality incarnate. Of course, we have the inimitable Lubena Nova on vocals, lyrics and melodies; but then thereโ€™s Jari Riitala as composer, arranger and double bass player. The combo is completed with Ville Vihko on piano, and Veikka Kajamies on drums. Finally, the whole piece is mixed and mastered by our very own Andres Guazzelli.

    Nowโ€ฆ I am aware that many music listeners (yes, even artists) are instantly put off by even the mention of jazz. And I understand(!)โ€ฆ to an extentโ€ฆ I think what I donโ€™t like is that โ€œeven a mentionโ€ bit. An instant switching off because โ€œOh yuk: jazz, I hate jazzโ€. Jazz can be as wide ranging as pop, so I urge you not to be so quick to judge until youโ€™ve listened. Be open. Be willing. You never know, you might actually like it! Shall we get jazzy? Letโ€™s. After a brief (but stupendous) piano introduction from Ville, Veikka sets the tempo with a snappy little drum fill, and weโ€™re in. Jariโ€™s bass is walking fast to the most vivacious of waltzes and Lubena simultaneously sings what I can only understand as the word โ€œwibaโ€. She repeats this word many times before we get into Verse 1. I was instantly baffled by this word. Was it even a word? It seems to have importance, as not only is this sung multiple times in the intro, it appears many times throughout the songโ€ฆ So I asked someone. My private source has informed me that this is in fact what I had initially been inclined to believe. Scat. โ€˜Wibaโ€™ is not a real word. I have never been sure if I like scatting, but have recently come to the conclusion that if a person can scat with immediate confidence, then it is good scatting. This is therefore good scat. Lubena gave me a right good scatting.

    Up to this point, the song already has tremendous bounce and movement, as each player dances around the full range of their instrument. Verse 1 changes key and the three instruments club together, very often playing in rhythmic unison, somehow simplifying the music, thus drawing oneโ€™s attention to Lubenaโ€™s vocals as she sings in the oh-so operatic style that only she knows: โ€œI am the woman who doesnโ€™t exist. I have no identity, Iโ€™m never missedโ€. There is a falling chromaticism to each line, ending on a grounded chord that wants to go further. And further is exactly where it goes. In fact, this is one of the joys of TWWDE. It just doesnโ€™t sit still. And yet, there is definite form, thanks to Jariโ€™s excellent, natural writing. The โ€˜wibaโ€™ motif is actually VERY clever, because in returning to this every once in a while, we have something to latch on to (as novices in the field of jazz). This section is the bounciest, most catchy part, making TWWDE a piece not only for the jazzers but for a wider audience not so used to such herbs and spices. My ignorant palate can easily taste, digest and even enjoy this, and it puts me in the mood for more! Pop suddenly sounds a little โ€œwhat it says on the tinโ€.

    Two minutes into the five-and-a-half-minute piece, Ville Vihkoโ€™s piano solo begins. It is of the absolute highest standard. Just impeccable, with nods to those lively, more spritely players – Dave Brubeck, David Newton (Stacey Kentโ€™s pianist), Jamie Cullum, to name a few. The keys are dry and to the fore, but still blending so well with its siblings. The solo is a full minute long, and it never gets dull, but never gets โ€œtoo jazzyโ€ for the average ear. Crisp and precise yet full of lifeโ€™s experience. The full band rejoins as a unit for around 40 seconds, while Lubena perches comfortably on top. Veikka Kajamies then takes centre stage, as the band pauses for a shot of non-alcoholic gin. Veikka delivers a fiery yet considered drum solo from the heavens. You will absolutely feel you are listening live at a jazz club. It is 20-30 seconds of โ€œI wish I could do thatโ€, before setting up again for the band to come together. Itโ€™s Wiba time!! The final minute is simply pure style. A notch above.

    Of course, this will not be for everyone. I shouldnโ€™t think Fig Fable imagines itโ€™s for everyone either. But I tell you, Iโ€™d much rather listen to this than Taylor Swift or Olivia Rodrigo. There is something so pleasing and fulfilling about great musicians coming together and making proper music. The kind of music that Iโ€™m not good enough to play. The kind of music that demands a lot more thought and concentration as a listener. Itโ€™s worth the extra effort. I am enriched! Oh, and Lubena? Iโ€™m pleased you exist.

    Compared to these fabulous musicians, I feel like an untalented TV presenter. And Iโ€™m not even famous.
    Fame or no fame, I will now make my escape. Hello, Goodbye.

    Listen to ๐™๐™๐™š ๐™’๐™ค๐™ข๐™–๐™ฃ ๐™’๐™๐™ค ๐˜ฟ๐™ค๐™š๐™จ๐™ฃโ€™๐™ฉ ๐™€๐™ญ๐™ž๐™จ๐™ฉ on the ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐˜†โ€™๐˜€ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ Spotify playlist HERE!

    Listen to ๐™๐™๐™š ๐™’๐™ค๐™ข๐™–๐™ฃ ๐™’๐™๐™ค ๐˜ฟ๐™ค๐™š๐™จ๐™ฃโ€™๐™ฉ ๐™€๐™ญ๐™ž๐™จ๐™ฉ on the ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐˜†โ€™๐˜€ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ Apple Music playlist HERE!

    Listen to ๐™๐™๐™š ๐™’๐™ค๐™ข๐™–๐™ฃ ๐™’๐™๐™ค ๐˜ฟ๐™ค๐™š๐™จ๐™ฃโ€™๐™ฉ ๐™€๐™ญ๐™ž๐™จ๐™ฉ on YouTube HERE!

    Follow ๐™‡๐™ช๐™—๐™š๐™ฃ๐™– ๐™‰๐™ค๐™ซ๐™– on Instagram HERE!

    Follow ๐™‡๐™ช๐™—๐™š๐™ฃ๐™– ๐™‰๐™ค๐™ซ๐™– on TwiX HERE!

    Follow ๐™๐™ž๐™ž๐™ฉ๐™–๐™ก๐™– on Instagram HERE!

    Please share this post and let me know your thoughts in the comments below

  • ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐˜†โ€™๐˜€ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ – this week: Prophets for Profit – Ed Eagle

    ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐˜†โ€™๐˜€ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ – this week: Prophets for Profit – Ed Eagle

    Welcome all to ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐˜†โ€™๐˜€ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ, a series of weekly reviews by Charles Connolly – an artist in his own right. Here, Charles delves into the greatest brand new singles brought to you by the best unsigned artists on our electrifying and eclectic set of ๐™‰๐™š๐™ฌ ๐˜ผ๐™ง๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™จ๐™ฉ ๐™Ž๐™ฅ๐™ค๐™ฉ๐™ก๐™ž๐™œ๐™๐™ฉ playlists.

    ๐™‹๐™ง๐™ค๐™ฅ๐™๐™š๐™ฉ๐™จ ๐™›๐™ค๐™ง ๐™‹๐™ง๐™ค๐™›๐™ž๐™ฉ – ๐™€๐™™ ๐™€๐™–๐™œ๐™ก๐™š

    Charles trends the buckโ€ฆ

    Sorry, Iโ€™m backโ€ฆ Forgive me if this piece seems a little erratic and all over the place. My mind right now is a little erratic and all over the place – stands to reason. Going away and coming back is such a jolt to the system that I feel discombobulated. My thoughts and feelings are, how can I put itโ€ฆ Messi. In being away, I missed out on the relentlessly glorious (and therefore horrible) hot English weather. I missed out on the pubs being open till 5am. Iโ€™m not sure much else happened in Britain other than the murder of a politician, wildfires in Scotland and Wales (surely a first) and, of course, yet another switch of Prime Minister (most certainly NOT a first). We do this every few months in Britain, with every successor being just as uninspiring, inept or dangerous as the last. It feels a bit like skipping dud tracks on Spotify; except that Spotify doesnโ€™t govern a country. Once I had arrived home and attempted to settle back into the swing of things (so far a complete failure), Sunday night was the World Cup Final. So, along with most of the world, Iโ€ฆ No, I didnโ€™t. I didnโ€™t feel like watching it. Mainly because I didnโ€™t much care by this point. Neither teamโ€™s nation particularly means anything to me so I wouldnโ€™t really be rooting for either side. Also, said discombobulation was in full swing, so instead I sat and read. It felt like a nice, traditional Sunday evening.

    The following morning, I read about all that had happened throughout the Final, and it got me thinking about the entire tournament as a whole. I had watched a couple of the England games while abroad so I was still able to have caught the feeling. Those adverts, eh? Theyโ€™re always so different to usual adverts. Crisps (potato chips), beer, online betting, Google A.I., and at least in Poland – for that is where I have been – a slender version of Peperami. I must say, I did find it fascinating to watch Polish adverts. They were as embarrassing, dated and bizarre as the Half Time Show – donโ€™t worry, weโ€™ll get to that in a bit. The majority of these adverts included famous footballers (because their wealth only starts at football). Some of them are current, some of them are from the past, and some of them are seen almost like prophets of our time. David Beckham springs to mindโ€ฆ Having retired from the game 13 years ago, he must be almost penniless by now, having not held a steady job for so long. I do hope he has a decent pension plan; poor lad. Actually, it turns out he is on โ€œbenefitsโ€. Or rather, he is certainly benefitting from the 12 brands (at least) for which he made adverts during the World Cup. These โ€œbenefitsโ€ amounted to around $25 million. Which is even more than the cost of my little holiday! After seeing that staggering figure it’s definitely time for me to have a well earned hydration breakโ€ฆ

    What a cleverly coined term: โ€œHydration Breakโ€. What they meant was, Advert Break!! Theyโ€™ll do just anything to make a bit more money, whilst losing momentum in the game, with just enough time for the playersโ€™ muscles to seize up. And all for that golden dollarโ€ฆ Hydration break: because we care (about embiggening the buck). How deliciously and surreptitiously capitalistic. After a few more minutes of that Final’s stalemate, it’s advert time again as we reach Half Time. And so the game resumes… No, wait… It does not. This is AMERICA!! Land of the free!! Land of the excess!! No game of football is complete without a tiny concert in the middle!!! Were you dancing along to the impeccable masterpiece that was the Half Time Show…? Madonna! Shakira! Justin Bieber! BTS! No? Well, neither was I. Partly because I missed it, but also partly because it was apparently absolutely dire and embarrassing. Not to mention ill-judged. What I haven’t seen mentioned, though, was how each act was just so dated and out of touch. Not just the artists’ fault, but the fault of whoever chose the acts (I believe the show was curated by Coldplay’s Chris Martin, so that might explain a thing or two, having become thoroughly Los Angelised). 25 or 30 years ago, Madonna might have been a good choice. 10 years ago Justin Bieber might have been a good choice. 20 years ago, Shakira might have been a good choice. 5 or 6 years ago, BTS might have been a good choice… But in 2026, this is not what we want. And in truth, I am sure very few wanted a show of any kind. Anyway: I missed out on that – in a manner of speaking. For me, the World Cup 2026 was an obese advert for America – the worst side of America. Profit first, football last. It is no secret that football would not be the mega thing it is now if it were not for mega profit. Of course, this has always been the case for pretty much everything ever in the history of the worldโ€ฆ But it didnโ€™t used to be on this scale. The game was always the meat around which the event was based. This time, though, I feel like the ball game was the thing to be slotted in amongst the rest of the vulgar circus.

    Shall we finally get to the New Artist Spotlight’s very own prophet…? The man who started it all? The man who had a vision based solely on promoting independent music where every single artist pays exactly zero pennies to be a member…? Please welcome this fine young American, Ed Eagle! Despite that introduction, he needs no introduction. While he might be American, he stands for the good side of America. I still believe that there is so much good left in America, even though the world’s press slams it daily. The worst of America is in its government and mega corporations. The best of America lies in its people; the Americans. Hence why there are so many lovely Americans living in Britain these days. Taking an American out of America seems to be like removing the impurities of said American, allowing said American to thrive and enjoy life, giving smiles and good vibes to all they encounter elsewhere. Which is probably why Ed Eagle now resides in Canada. Of course, he will always have the original American values at heart: freedom, equality, peace, a bitchin’ collection of guitars… I have known Ed for 6 years and counting. If the NAS were to be seen as a place of education, I might even say we went to school together! Heโ€™d be the football type, all boisterous and leader-like, while Iโ€™d be the quieter, more sensitive type. The thing is, we have always had music in common. Just to be clear, we did not actually go to school together, in case you read that line a bit fast. We have not always seen eye-to-eye with everything regarding the NAS, but that is simply because we are very different people, and any organisation needs to be a little business-like in order for it to work smoothly (I canโ€™t stand the business side of anything). The lovely thing is, we are both good souls with genuinely good motives, and we both have a great love and appreciation for music. We also both treat fellow artists like family. It is therefore with great pleasure that I bring you Ed Eagleโ€™s latest single, โ€˜Prophets for Profitโ€™!

    Ed has always been one of the kings of โ€œstatement musicโ€. He is not one to mince his words. He is not one for subtlety. He says what he feels. Which, I must say, is something I like about Americans. There are few layers of dry sarcasm and politeness to tear away before reaching the real substance of the matter. Itโ€™s just simply THERE. He tends to make big, epic songs. Not necessarily in sound (some of his songs are acoustic with a soft edge), but in the point he is making. I feel like his lyrics are the most important part of the writing process for him. For example, โ€˜I Miss Youโ€™, โ€˜Damaged Goodsโ€™ and โ€˜Bye!โ€™ are all much softer songs of his, but the story of each of them is epic and resonant. โ€˜Prophets for Profitโ€™ is very much one of his โ€œstatementโ€ songs, as opposed to one of his more personal themes. Of course, he is not talking about footballers or the World Cup, but I do get the feeling he is talking about America and the careless greed of its powerful cog-turners. So FIFA might actually fall into that categoryโ€ฆ There are some big, powerful moneymen in this world right now, much like there have always been. But I donโ€™t know if they have ever been so big, so rich, so powerful, and so cutthroat. The biggest and most recent offenders seem to be the young tech wizards with their HAL (A.I.) companies. They so proudly and brazenly break laws and parade around as though they are showing off the corpse of a lion they have just shot. They care not a jot about the carnage left in their tracks (I think they’re quite proud of it!), so long as their wallets are fit to burst. In fact, Ed even included a specific verse about HAL, where it takes all our jobs until thereโ€™s nothing left. He phrases it MUCH better and more poetically, but Iโ€™d rather leave the details to your own ears, first-hand. So, Ed is evidently not a fan of HAL.

    However, HAL is not the focus of the song. It mainly hones in on the more obviously serious matters, like people dying because of needless war. And how rich criminals are able to continue with their filthy crimes while innocent poor people are starving. There is no direct mention of the big orange man at the top, but to me it is clear (I could be wrong) that this jaundiced fellow is on the mind of the narrator, even if the name doesnโ€™t quite reach the microphoneโ€™s diaphragm. One chunk oโ€™ woyds that does appear 3 times through the song, is โ€œWho makes a profit, when a baby dies? Is he a prophet, or the devil in disguise?โ€โ€ฆ This line is a baseball bat to the face in terms of impact, and itโ€™s right that it appears 3 times. Especially when it eventually leads to what for me is undeniably the greatest part of the song (also 3 times – 4 if you count the repeat at the end). In fact this bit is one of my favourite bits of any Ed Eagle song. It is expertly dealt with, exquisitely rendered, and frankly perfect in all ways. When coming to this section for the first time, the song is thus far a great, heavy rock song. It has slamming drums, a technically challenging riff, a bassline that echoes the riff in a lower register, and Edโ€™s spoken voice atop the lot. But as soon as Ed starts to growl like an angry bear with the lyrics โ€œWhen will weโ€ฆโ€, the whole song changes entirely. We are met with about 6 Eds screaming in perfect synchronisation to the words โ€œRise Up!!โ€ – It is absolutely thrilling!! There is suddenly space, though. This isnโ€™t the moment where the song goes full-on everything to 11. The song doesnโ€™t really do that, which I think is where it shines. Weight doesnโ€™t come from volume and density. It comes from contrast and passion. I feel like Ed has grown up a bit. He still retains his fervent views and values but he is now able to relay them with more dignity and grace. Ed Eagle is cooler now.

    My final words on the World Cup:
    Where was the dignity? Where was the grace? Actually, there was SOME. The end of that England/Norway game, both teams behaved impeccably. In fact, it was rather fond and heartwarming to see the bromantic hugs from one side to another. England was not gloating, but modestly (and justly) happy. Norway was neither angry nor bitter; they were heartbroken. And the England players made sure to comfort them and make sure they were okay; England themselves being all too familiar with the feeling of getting close but not close enough.

    In the words of Edโ€™s debut single, โ€œIt doesnโ€™t matter the teamโ€.

    Surely Madonna should have chosen her hit โ€˜Donโ€™t Cry for Me Argentinaโ€™โ€ฆ But then again, after Argentinaโ€™s disgusting behaviour once the final whistle had been blown, I shouldnโ€™t think anyone was shedding any tearsโ€ฆ

    All the more reason to hold on to those islands. Hydration break!!!

    Listen to ๐™‹๐™ง๐™ค๐™ฅ๐™๐™š๐™ฉ๐™จ ๐™›๐™ค๐™ง ๐™‹๐™ง๐™ค๐™›๐™ž๐™ฉ on the ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐˜†โ€™๐˜€ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ Spotify playlist HERE!

    Listen to ๐™‹๐™ง๐™ค๐™ฅ๐™๐™š๐™ฉ๐™จ ๐™›๐™ค๐™ง ๐™‹๐™ง๐™ค๐™›๐™ž๐™ฉ on the ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐˜†โ€™๐˜€ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ Apple Music playlist HERE!

    Listen to ๐™‹๐™ง๐™ค๐™ฅ๐™๐™š๐™ฉ๐™จ ๐™›๐™ค๐™ง ๐™‹๐™ง๐™ค๐™›๐™ž๐™ฉ on YouTube HERE!

    Follow ๐™€๐™™ ๐™€๐™–๐™œ๐™ก๐™š on Instagram HERE!

    Follow ๐™€๐™™ ๐™€๐™–๐™œ๐™ก๐™š on TwiX HERE!

    Please share this post and let me know your thoughts in the comments below

  • ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐˜†โ€™๐˜€ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ – this week: Karate DLC – SovRin

    ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐˜†โ€™๐˜€ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ – this week: Karate DLC – SovRin

    Welcome all to ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐˜†โ€™๐˜€ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ, a series of weekly reviews by Charles Connolly – an artist in his own right. Here, Charles delves into the greatest brand new singles brought to you by the best unsigned artists on our electrifying and eclectic set of ๐™‰๐™š๐™ฌ ๐˜ผ๐™ง๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™จ๐™ฉ ๐™Ž๐™ฅ๐™ค๐™ฉ๐™ก๐™ž๐™œ๐™๐™ฉ playlists.

    ๐™†๐™–๐™ง๐™–๐™ฉ๐™š ๐˜ฟ๐™‡๐˜พ – ๐™Ž๐™ค๐™ซ๐™๐™ž๐™ฃ

    Charles sees senseiโ€ฆ

    The internet has achieved many things over the decades. Some of them even positive! But for me, there is one longstanding feat that is very much still ongoing. In showing me the lives of seemingly the entire worldโ€™s population, I watch, I stare, I observe. I am stunned. It is staggering to see the things that people will do. The lengths people will go to in order to show how brave, daring or stupid they can be. Itโ€™s just fascinating – but also often rather off-putting. The vanity, the smug dumbness, the relentlessness. Oh, and the TRENDS!! Once one idiot does something, another 50,000 will follow suit. Itโ€™s all a bit absurd, and it shows off the worst of society – the dumb and the sheep who aspire to be dumb. It makes me think back to what used to be on TVโ€ฆ Interviews with great minds being intelligent, interesting and witty. Documentaries that uncovered a world we never knew. Dramas that took their time with narration that most these days would barely be able to comprehend, yet alone be able to concentrate for more than 3 minutes. Oh, and game shows – tacky game shows that were I suppose the equivalent of what most of the internet is nowadaysโ€ฆ

    But the internet also shows us something that we didnโ€™t quite realise before we were online. You see, TV was pretty much everything back then. That was all we had to go on. Stars were leagues above others. The great intellectuals were admired for their extreme rare brilliance. Experts were a coveted species. Artists were barely of this planet in being entirely unique. And famous comedians were the only people who could make us laugh (admittedly largely debatable). Then the internet was bornโ€ฆ Of course, we had a decade or two of dross and gimmicks, but eventually we started to see something; started to notice and realise. The world is absolutely chock full of talent! And it is this that constantly astounds me. Just how many people are quietly being brilliant in their neck of the woods. Well, maybe not so quietly now, but theyโ€™re not in a television studio, explaining in a bad suit. They are able to remain wherever they wish, while showing the world what they can do. Itโ€™s enlightening and genuinely uplifting!

    What REALLY fascinates me, though, is when someone so quickly and effortlessly achieves something that not only would I not be able to do, but something that I donโ€™t understand. Something that is just so far from my brain as to be alien. Talent excites me – this is no secret. But itโ€™s not just arty talent; itโ€™s ANY talent. For example, when a craftsman who dabbles in electronics, casually invents and creates something so fresh and unique before our very eyes. It could be something incredibly useful and brilliant (a house with an automatically detachable roof), or it could be something completely and utterly pointless and stupid (a house with an automatically detachable roof). But I watch these โ€œnobodiesโ€ in awe. Or what about the recent breed of Chinese musical prodigiesโ€ฆ? At just 5 years old, they are already better than some fully-grown stars of 50 years ago! Of course, HAL (A.I.) is spoiling this recent influx of talent by making us believe that what we are seeing is real, when in fact it never took place. But I see no reason for these HAL videos; we have the genuine talent surrounding us already! We just have to find it. And thankfully, finding it has never been so easy. We canโ€™t avoid such great talent these days. In fact, thereโ€™s almost too much incredible talent that we need to take a step back and isolate each little morsel we happen upon. Too much of anything is over-saturation. And over-saturation of a good thing can lead to a certain numbness and inability to be excited or even moved. Around a decade ago I coined the phrase โ€œchurch fatigueโ€. It was when my lady-person and I were in Romeโ€ฆ โ€œOh, another breathtakingly beautiful church. Oh look, another Caravaggio. Shall we have lunch now?โ€ – after a while, all this perfect brilliance just ceases to have any impact.

    And so, I would like to refresh and restore said impact. I think, in a way, my little reviews attempt to do this by really trying to make you appreciate the layers and depth of the music. The raw talent and effort that goes into making these little gems. Gems that might easily have passed you by. True gems are hard to come by these days (and I canโ€™t afford them), so hereโ€™s a sovereign. Well, almost. Please welcome an artist who has not passed through these gates since CC Episode 15, six years ago: SovRin. His real name is rather less impressive: Ralph Aldridge – which doesnโ€™t sound very Germanโ€ฆ The main reason he has not appeared in recent years is not because his output his dipped or waned in quantity or quality, but simply because I usually try to pick pieces of music that will appeal to most. Not all, but most – without picking generic releases. This does sometimes mean that I am bound to miss out some crackingly unusual pieces from time to time. I thought it best to allow one of those pieces to slide in for a change. The work of SovRin has always been (and I hope will always be) different, and unlike anyone else. He has his own style. A style which dots between dubstep and chiptune. Those not familiar with those terms will probably not enjoy either. Many will classify this music as โ€œgamer musicโ€ (the kind of music that appears in retro-style video games). I personally would not specifically classify it as this, simply because I have never been a โ€œgamerโ€, unless you include the odd round of Scrabble – which I donโ€™t think counts.

    I have heard quite a bit of this style of music over the years, and I always immediately want to switch it off. I usually find it intensely irritating and very dull. SovRin, on the other hand, sounds to me like the Bach of the genre. Leagues ahead, on another level and in a different realm. Bach was German, and despite the very British name, SovRin is also in fact German. Germans are known for their precision and their just-so attitude. His work has always been very precise and just so, like Bachโ€™s. But SovRinโ€™s Germanic tendencies can lead him to be a bit of a Germaniac in music. You will hear the maniac in all his music, but what sets him apart from all the other crazy gamer music out there, is his genuinely Bach-like compositions. Admittedly SovRinโ€™s latest release, โ€˜Karate DLCโ€™, is not quite as classically themed as previous releases of his, but it does still have strong links to that oeuvre. So, this piece is more โ€œBach with perhaps some influence from Madeon and Pendulumโ€. Let us look at the tuneโ€™s titleโ€ฆ โ€˜Karateโ€, could – like the cover artwork suggests – simply be a literal reference to karate video games in general. But then again, it could be a reference to Mr. Karate from various Japanese SNK games (look, I didnโ€™t know about any of this either, and – in case youโ€™re wondering – it stands for โ€˜Shin Nihon Kikakuโ€™); Mr. Karate, being the alter ego of Takuma Sakazaki (obviously). And he looks absolutely ridiculous, like heโ€™s just stepped out of a Studio Ghibli film. As to โ€˜DLCโ€™, it stands for โ€œdownloaded contentโ€ – but of course.

    This stuff is so far from anything I know, that I feel entirely immersed in anotherโ€™s culture, and at their mercy. I am helpless without their guidance, and am therefore forced to trust them, with no other choices available. But trust SovRin I DO! Which leads me to my third and (whoโ€™s counting??) final point: I am in awe. I like to think I know quite a bit about music and what goes into making it. I would say I know music like a car mechanic knows the underneath of the bonnet – thatโ€™s not a pretty hat, but what Americans call the hood, not to be confused with what everyone habitually wears everywhere except their head. But donโ€™t get the bonnet mixed up with the boot, which Americans call the trunk (which is an elephant nose, because an elephant knows). Frankly, I donโ€™t know how car mechanics do it! Having never driven a car, I stick with music. And yet, listening to SovRinโ€™s music makes me feel like I donโ€™t know an A flat from a G apartment. Just HOW on EARTH does he DO IT??! They do call him โ€œthe wizardโ€ for a reason. Itโ€™s pure magic! And like all the best magic, I donโ€™t wish to know how itโ€™s done. Otherwise itโ€™s just a talented trick. The way young Sov packs in a million and one correct notes in the only way they know how. Sometimes with extreme staccato attack, sometimes with a portamento bend. Sometimes with a gnarly distorted synth that will blow your head off, sometimes with a softer heartfelt piano, but usually with mega fat beatz in order to give you something to understand. And all the while, everything is impeccably mixed. It must surely take him months to make a 3-minute instrumental piece. Manโ€™s got skillz, yeh? Yeh.

    SovRin puts in all this effort, and all you have to do is press play.

    Iโ€™ve got to continue with my damned detachable roof project. Lord knows why I chose a building with a spireโ€ฆ Now I REALLY understand church fatigue.

    Listen to ๐™†๐™–๐™ง๐™–๐™ฉ๐™š ๐˜ฟ๐™‡๐˜พ on the ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐˜†โ€™๐˜€ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ Spotify playlist HERE!

    Listen to ๐™†๐™–๐™ง๐™–๐™ฉ๐™š ๐˜ฟ๐™‡๐˜พ on the ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐˜†โ€™๐˜€ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ Apple Music playlist HERE!

    Listen to ๐™†๐™–๐™ง๐™–๐™ฉ๐™š ๐˜ฟ๐™‡๐˜พ on YouTube HERE!

    Follow ๐™Ž๐™ค๐™ซ๐™๐™ž๐™ฃ on Instagram HERE!

    Follow ๐™Ž๐™ค๐™ซ๐™๐™ž๐™ฃ on TwiX HERE!

    Please share this post and let me know your thoughts in the comments below

  • ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐˜†โ€™๐˜€ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ – this week: Save You (feat. Terrence & The Optimistics) – Brendon Nicholas

    ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐˜†โ€™๐˜€ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ – this week: Save You (feat. Terrence & The Optimistics) – Brendon Nicholas

    Welcome all to ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐˜†โ€™๐˜€ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ, a series of weekly reviews by Charles Connolly – an artist in his own right. Here, Charles delves into the greatest brand new singles brought to you by the best unsigned artists on our electrifying and eclectic set of ๐™‰๐™š๐™ฌ ๐˜ผ๐™ง๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™จ๐™ฉ ๐™Ž๐™ฅ๐™ค๐™ฉ๐™ก๐™ž๐™œ๐™๐™ฉ playlists.

    ๐™Ž๐™–๐™ซ๐™š ๐™”๐™ค๐™ช (๐™›๐™š๐™–๐™ฉ. ๐™๐™š๐™ง๐™ง๐™š๐™ฃ๐™˜๐™š & ๐™๐™๐™š ๐™Š๐™ฅ๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™ข๐™ž๐™จ๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™˜๐™จ) – ๐˜ฝ๐™ง๐™š๐™ฃ๐™™๐™ค๐™ฃ ๐™‰๐™ž๐™˜๐™๐™ค๐™ก๐™–๐™จ

    Charles enjoys the weatherโ€ฆ

    What is it about the sunshine that makes us smile? โ€œHow would YOU know, CC? Youโ€™re in England!โ€ – Okay, let me clear up this myth once and for all. I donโ€™t live in Yorkshire (the North), I live in London (the South). London gets tonnes of great weather. It does not rain all the time. In fact, it is usually not raining. We get far more sun than rain. The sky is usually kind to us in London. So, seeing the sun is quite normal. These days, summer is no longer โ€œcross yer fingers and hope for the odd day of okay weatherโ€. Summer in London is pretty bloody similar to the rest of Europe – thank you, global warming (or coincidence, depending on whose side youโ€™re on)โ€ฆ Right now, Europe is going through the most tremendous heatwave, and England is no exception. Last week was hot, this week is hot, and next week will be hot. And when I say hot, I mean tomorrow will apparently be 37ยฐC (roughly 99ยฐF for those of the traditional system). So, to conclude, it is a myth that London gets dismal, cold, wet weather at all times.

    Where was I? Oh yes. I was being English in talking about the weather. Despite being oh-so used to lovely weather for quite a lot of the year, we English are still stuck on auto-mode. We get excited when the sun comes out. We plan to get outside and burn. Actually, we tend not to plan. We instead simply rush out like impatient dogs; flip-flops at the ready (slap-slap, slap-slap – who doesnโ€™t hate that sound?). But I think the biggest change is our frame of mind. It suddenly doesnโ€™t really matter to us that our Prime Minister is stepping down. The increasingly extortionate prices of just about anything seem just irrelevant. An incompetent police force seems unimportant at a time when crime seems unfathomable. World affairs are that of the World, not of our own. Wars continue to ensue, โ€œbut it ainโ€™t MY warโ€โ€ฆ We instantly crave a personal happiness; contentment within oneโ€™s own mind. And so, into the rays we go! A queer sensation occurs below the noseโ€ฆ It is an involuntary smile, complete with the unfounded โ€œassuranceโ€ that everything is going to be okay. Nay, everything is going to be completely and utterly tickety-boo (a glorious little English term roughly meaning hunky-dory).

    Have you noticed – providing they are not too irritable from the unbearable swelter – that people are kinder when the sunโ€™s out? I do NOT include drivers in this statement – their angry resentment seems to be present no matter the season. Outside of the tin can on wheels, though, you yourself are kinder, no? Have you noticed? The scene is blissful, and you want it to stay that way. But itโ€™s no fun being the only happy person. Like The Turtles, we want to be โ€˜Happy Togetherโ€™. There is an air of universal optimism brought on by nothing but golden rays. Such a simple trigger, but I am just so grateful for such a trigger. It puts a delightful spin on the term โ€œtrigger-happyโ€. And so, you leave the house. Music playing through your lugholes and a confident swagger in your step. Naked arms and naked ankles. The lightest breeze saving you from overheating. Itโ€™s glorious! And yet, you turn the corner, and some poor womanโ€™s shopping bag has split; her purchases rolling into the roadโ€ฆ In duller weather, one might choose not to have not noticed and just so happen to cross the road while looking in the opposite directionโ€ฆ โ€œDoo doo-dooโ€ฆ Nothing to see hereโ€โ€ฆ But in this heavenly sunshine, you find yourself stooping down to help the lady, smiling all the while. It just isnโ€™t conscious. You have become the automatic saint. There is nothing to gain from this act of kindness, and yet you do it so instinctively, as though the poor unfortunate is your own mother. The lady is bowled over by your manners, and once again, that Turtles song bellows through the horns of an ice cream van.

    But enough of sheltered reptiles. Shelter is the last thing on our minds right now. We want sun and music. We have the sun. Check! So, what music do we pick for such cloudless times? The Beach Boys? Would make sense, but I want something fresh. Something modern, but with a golden hue of familiarity. Perfect; I have just the thing. Are you feeling positive yet? I do hope so. But if youโ€™re still heavily frowning, fear not! The Optimists are here! Or rather, the Optimisticsโ€ฆ Please welcome Brendon Nicholas and Terrence & The Optimistics! This is New Zealand at its finest. Those of you who have quietly wondered the whereabouts of Old Zealand, let me quench that mild intrigue of yours. Old Zealand (Zealand) is the western-most coastal part of the Netherlands. It translates simply as sea land (for obvious reasons). New Zealand was discovered by a Dutchman who named it New Zealand. Which frankly is a rather lazy naming scheme, but I canโ€™t help but feel this isnโ€™t exactly too important right now. Anyway: ponderance quenched. What with this โ€œnewโ€ land being rather spoilt for sun, both Brendon and Terrence are natural optimists. They also make up the total of said Optimistics.

    Usually, the duo likes to have Terrence Bull as the lead songwriter and general all-round music man, so that Brendon Nicholas can be the voice of the song. ALL CHANGE!! This time, Terrence takes a backseat, remaining only for mixing duties (a thoroughly underrated role – ahem). Brendon has all hands on deck for their latest song, โ€˜Save Youโ€™. To put it crassly, this is Brendonโ€™s baby. He wrote the song, sang the song, and played all the instruments. โ€˜Save Youโ€™ is a joyous tune. It lifts the Venetian blinds to the ceiling, allowing the sunlight to drench your view as you sip that mandatory morning coffee in contemplation of the inevitably great day ahead. You feel like Superman when Superman has been Superman for a long time. Youโ€™re just used to being brilliant. To give you an idea of the sound weโ€™re talking about here, think Weezer, The Beach Boys, Ben Folds Five, Sean Ono, Joan Jett, Beck, Dodgy and The Shins. But mainly, think Eels. No, not those repellent things that squirm when you squirm. The band. Itโ€™s uncanny how much Brendon sounds like Mark Oliver Everitt, Eelsโ€™ lead singer. Which to me can only be a good thing. In October of last year, I mentioned the idea of how Michael Jackson would have sounded in the โ€˜60sโ€ฆ Well, now I again seem to be brought back to the same concept, but this time with a different artist. โ€˜Save Youโ€™ is how I imagine Nirvana to sound, should they have been around in the โ€˜60s. Itโ€™s a funny idea, but I must say, I do like this little game of placing a certain artist in a completely different era, then imagining what they would sound like (I also have images of them in my mind, and itโ€™s quite amusing). This is far more fun than not bothering with the imagination part and just requesting HAL (A.I.) to make this happen before our very eyes. We mustnโ€™t have substantial brain rot before the decade (or year) is out. This will happen naturally – just give it time.

    โ€™Save Youโ€™ is a song about helping people. Itโ€™s incredibly upbeat without being soppy in the slightest; mainly due to its fist-thrust-high manner with a rocking riff to match. But it is not without hippie sentiment, man. After an instrumental chorus for starters, these verses chime high with that clean Rickenbacker-like jangle; vocal melodies to the fore. Harmonies bloom as though itโ€™s Motherโ€™s Day. And then our bright sun rises for the chorus! The intro riff comes into fruition with spectacular tight vocals: โ€œDo you, need me, to save, to save you?โ€ – itโ€™s earnest, honest and willing. Proof that once we are okay within ourselves, we will naturally come to the aid of others. Howโ€™s THAT for optimism?? After two rounds of a chorus fit for a pub singalong, weโ€™re pretty much at the halfway mark. Too early for a bridge, surelyโ€ฆ Nope. It certainly feels like the right point for a change. This bridge does just what a bridge should do: itโ€™s an alternate flavour of the same ilk. We havenโ€™t journeyed to a foreign land, but merely moved to the garden for a change of scenery. And like all pro bridges, it segues perfectly back into the next chorus. The thing is, normally in โ€œsong-formโ€ this would be the final chorusโ€ฆ Thereโ€™s a reason that bridge came earlier than usualโ€ฆ We have enough time now for a brief but excellent guitar solo! NOW we get our final chorus. The thing is, this song wouldnโ€™t really hold together without Terrenceโ€™s part. The mix is solid, unified and enjoyable. You probably wonโ€™t be aware of the mixโ€ฆ While sounding like an affront, this is in fact high praise for any mixing engineer. The mix should be invisible. And doesnโ€™t the duo work well as a twosome? I should say so; they grew up together, having known each other for 45 years!!

    โ€˜Save Youโ€™ is just so fun! Full of exuberance and vim! The perfect song for my wander in the English sunshine.

    Thereโ€™s a fresh, new zeal to it all. The old zeal is Dutch.

    Listen to ๐™Ž๐™–๐™ซ๐™š ๐™”๐™ค๐™ช on the ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐˜†โ€™๐˜€ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ Spotify playlist HERE!

    Listen to ๐™Ž๐™–๐™ซ๐™š ๐™”๐™ค๐™ช on the ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐˜†โ€™๐˜€ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ Apple Music playlist HERE!

    Listen to ๐™Ž๐™–๐™ซ๐™š ๐™”๐™ค๐™ช on YouTube HERE!

    Follow ๐˜ฝ๐™ง๐™š๐™ฃ๐™™๐™ค๐™ฃ ๐™‰๐™ž๐™˜๐™๐™ค๐™ก๐™–๐™จ on TwiX HERE!

    Follow ๐™๐™š๐™ง๐™ง๐™š๐™ฃ๐™˜๐™š & ๐™๐™๐™š ๐™Š๐™ฅ๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™ข๐™ž๐™จ๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™˜๐™จ on Instagram HERE!

    Follow ๐™๐™š๐™ง๐™ง๐™š๐™ฃ๐™˜๐™š & ๐™๐™๐™š ๐™Š๐™ฅ๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™ข๐™ž๐™จ๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™˜๐™จ on TwiX HERE!

    Please share this post and let me know your thoughts in the comments below

  • ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐˜†โ€™๐˜€ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ – this week: Black Sheep – Julience

    ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐˜†โ€™๐˜€ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ – this week: Black Sheep – Julience

    Welcome all to ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐˜†โ€™๐˜€ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ, a series of weekly reviews by Charles Connolly – an artist in his own right. Here, Charles delves into the greatest brand new singles brought to you by the best unsigned artists on our electrifying and eclectic set of ๐™‰๐™š๐™ฌ ๐˜ผ๐™ง๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™จ๐™ฉ ๐™Ž๐™ฅ๐™ค๐™ฉ๐™ก๐™ž๐™œ๐™๐™ฉ playlists.

    ๐˜ฝ๐™ก๐™–๐™˜๐™  ๐™Ž๐™๐™š๐™š๐™ฅ – ๐™…๐™ช๐™ก๐™ž๐™š๐™ฃ๐™˜๐™š

    Charles is knitting with woolโ€ฆ

    โ€œIf the shoe fits, wear itโ€ – so the saying goes. If the shoe doesnโ€™t fit, wear something else. Makes sense. But most tend to opt for an uncomfortable in-betweenโ€ฆ If the shoe doesnโ€™t fit, wear it anyway. These are my thoughts of the day. Confused? I know EYE am. In fact, Iโ€™ve always been a little confused. Mainly because things tend to make sense to me in a different way. Or they donโ€™t make sense to me in the slightest. Still confused? Yeah, I can see your furrowed brow from here. I am talking about the way EYE am versus the way most others are. And this applies to you too. Do you find that you look at the world a little differently to others? Of course you do. Youโ€™re an artist. We tend to be a little different in many ways. But it ainโ€™t just art and artists; it all stems back to schoolโ€ฆ

    Were you the one with long hair when everyone else had short hair? Or vice versa? Were you the one whoโ€™d rather stay at home and play guitar than go out and play sports? Were you always listening to different music to your peersโ€™? Ringing a bell yetโ€ฆ? How about at home? Family usually has that family connection, no? Where each member tends to have similar views, thoughts, feelingsโ€ฆ? But not you. You always had your own way of seeing the world. And because of all this, you were treated differently at home, in school and in later life? The odd one out? The weirdo? The wretched outcast? The black sheep…?

    โ€œFitting inโ€ is something we naturally do (or attempt to do) as a teenager. You werenโ€™t the only one. Everyone you knew was trying desperately to โ€œgo with the crowdโ€. Of course, there were the leaders and the followers. The leaders were often just as inauthentic as the followers; those leaders were usually just attention-seekers. Those followers were just trying to be part of something. The thing is, there are many of us who tried fitting in, failed to fit in, and instead just did our own thing. Thatโ€™s where most of us come in. My question is, whether it is weird to be different? Surely itโ€™s NATURAL to be different, no? Weโ€™re not clonesโ€ฆ Just because most of your friends left school and got office jobs, doesnโ€™t mean that YOU should have to do that. Rather than โ€œthemโ€ being the โ€œnormalโ€ ones and โ€œusโ€ being the โ€œweirdosโ€, I like to think of it differently. Howโ€™s about this (to make you feel a bit better about yourself)โ€ฆ YOU were honest with yourself. YOUโ€™RE one of the few who DIDNโ€™T bow to peer pressure and โ€œthe systemโ€. Those who chose to continue wearing the ill-fitting shoe, will potentially regret their decision as they hobble through life. But you? Youโ€™re a lone wolf in sheepโ€™s clothing! EMBRACE the black sheep in you! Welsh need not apply.

    THIS black sheep seems to have wandered aimlessly into a field of music. Mehh (says the sheep). Okay, it seems this sheep is not impressed. But one artist seems to stand outโ€ฆ A chap who although born Dutch, is based in Manchester, England. Please welcome your new favourite black sheep, Julience. And yes, his latest release is called โ€˜Black Sheepโ€™, but I think youโ€™d gathered that by now. This man has appeared 3 times in my โ€œmaybe listโ€, but has never quite managed to arrive on this page of mine. So, as I stick a gold star on Julienceโ€™s lapel, I smile.

    Iโ€™m going to morph into Billy Shears and reveal whatโ€™s underneath this โ€˜Black Sheepโ€™. My previous two reviews have covered unusual songs with complicated structures. THIS, is the complete polar opposite. It is proof that great songs donโ€™t always have to be complex. In fact, most of the songs you find yourself humming day-in, day-out, will probably be pretty simple songs. โ€˜Black Sheepโ€™ shows off such a fortรฉ. If youโ€™re gonna use just two chords, THIS is the way to do it. It is time to rock in a classic way. Thatโ€™s right, weโ€™re stepping back to somewhere between 1970 and 1976. We start immediately with a riff that conjures the spirit of Messrs. Jagger and Richards. Specifically โ€˜Start Me Upโ€™. Thatโ€™s in the left ear. But just one round in, weโ€™re introduced to the rest of the band with a second guitar on the right – one that sounds as though Mark Knopfler has borrowed Richardsโ€™ other guitar. Bass right down the middle, and drums that sound straight outta โ€˜All Right Nowโ€™ by Free. Yes, complete with unmistakable COWBELL!!! But PLEASE donโ€™t make the mandatory (theyโ€™re not mandatory) cowbell jokes in the comments. The cowbell is feeling a little put upon. But now we come to the voice. Imagine the attitude of Thin Lizzyโ€™s Phil Lynott and Bruce Springsteen with the vocal tone ofโ€ฆ ah damn, I canโ€™t quite get it. Can you? Maybe in the comments? Is it Roger Daltrey with a large sprinkling of Peter Gabriel? You tell me. My final comparison is probably not one that anyone else would come up withโ€ฆ Daft Punk, anyone? No, Iโ€™m not joking. Thereโ€™s a song called โ€˜Fragments of Timeโ€™ by Daft Punk & Todd Edwards that for some reason feels somewhat similar to me. The sound is entirely different. So is the genre. So is the entire song. And yet there is something there. Almost certainly complete coincidence, but I like to make these little comparisons – itโ€™s just the way my brain works. I hear you already: โ€œCoincidence?? Youโ€™re completely insane! Theyโ€™re nothing LIKE each other, you twat!โ€

    Butโ€ฆ Two chordsโ€ฆ How does this work? How can just two chords make a song great? Iโ€™ll tell ya. When we sing songs, we donโ€™t sing chords. We CANโ€™T sing chords. Instead, we sing melodies. Melodies with words. Which is two thirds of what makes up โ€œthe songโ€. Other than the chords, the rest is performance and production. Rock is in Julienceโ€™s veins. Which isnโ€™t about virtuosic ability, but a feel. Jagger did not have an incredible voice, he made a thrilling sound. Richards was never one of the greatest guitarists of all time; he made a thrilling sound. Itโ€™s more about attitude and rock ethic than anything else. You have to feel it to believe it. I felt it in Julienceโ€™s recordings, so I definitely believe it. The playing and the singing is everything, here. The performance. When it comes to rock, the performance is everything. Anyone can play Beatles songs, and โ€œthe songโ€ always shines (admittedly never as brightly as the original). But with rock, when a mediocre rock combo starts to play a Stones tune, the actual song usually falls flat on its face. Because itโ€™s simply not the Stones. The performance is why I adore Queens of the Stone Age. No one could take the place of Josh Homme, just like no one could take the place of Julience. His passionate singing voice, his edgy guitar tone, his masterful basslines, his sneaky OWgan parts, his fabulous drum fills, and yes, his cowbell; these are all of the things that make up โ€˜Black Sheepโ€™. The fact that itโ€™s just two chords becomes largely irrelevant. Itโ€™s a rocking little record (how many of you sang the next line?)โ€ฆ And speaking of lines, those lyrics are so integral to this being such a corker of a song – most of us relate. Weโ€™re all alone, together. Not as the song suggests, but as colossal woolly mammoths!

    I did it!! I actually wrote a short(er) article!!!

    If ever youโ€™re feeling like you donโ€™t belong, remember: Black Sheep Matter.

    Listen to ๐˜ฝ๐™ก๐™–๐™˜๐™  ๐™Ž๐™๐™š๐™š๐™ฅ on the ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐˜†โ€™๐˜€ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ Spotify playlist HERE!

    Listen to ๐˜ฝ๐™ก๐™–๐™˜๐™  ๐™Ž๐™๐™š๐™š๐™ฅ on the ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐˜†โ€™๐˜€ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ Apple Music playlist HERE!

    Watch ๐˜ฝ๐™ก๐™–๐™˜๐™  ๐™Ž๐™๐™š๐™š๐™ฅ on YouTube HERE!

    Follow ๐™…๐™ช๐™ก๐™ž๐™š๐™ฃ๐™˜๐™š on Instagram HERE!

    Follow ๐™…๐™ช๐™ก๐™ž๐™š๐™ฃ๐™˜๐™š on TwiX HERE!

    Please share this post and let me know your thoughts in the comments below

  • ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐˜†โ€™๐˜€ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ – this week: Rubber Mask of Holy Wrath – Robert Owen

    ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐˜†โ€™๐˜€ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ – this week: Rubber Mask of Holy Wrath – Robert Owen

    Welcome all to ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐˜†โ€™๐˜€ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ, a series of weekly reviews by Charles Connolly – an artist in his own right. Here, Charles delves into the greatest brand new singles brought to you by the best unsigned artists on our electrifying and eclectic set of ๐™‰๐™š๐™ฌ ๐˜ผ๐™ง๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™จ๐™ฉ ๐™Ž๐™ฅ๐™ค๐™ฉ๐™ก๐™ž๐™œ๐™๐™ฉ playlists.

    ๐™๐™ช๐™—๐™—๐™š๐™ง ๐™ˆ๐™–๐™จ๐™  ๐™ค๐™› ๐™ƒ๐™ค๐™ก๐™ฎ ๐™’๐™ง๐™–๐™ฉ๐™ – ๐™๐™ค๐™—๐™š๐™ง๐™ฉ ๐™Š๐™ฌ๐™š๐™ฃ

    Charles is speaking artfullyโ€ฆ

    Over the course of the last few years, we have witnessed the progressive speed of A.I. and generative A.I. (what I habitually like to call โ€œHALโ€ for simplicityโ€™s sake). This has been faster than any other cultural change. Not just in how quickly we have altered our way of doing things, but how fast the technology has improved. It was seemingly weekly leaps. Which is frankly too fast for average humans to keep up with, or even be comfortable with. On the whole, we humans cannot comprehend this kind of progression at such a rapid pace. We need time to mull it over and work it all out. Most of us do not think in terms of ones and zeros, but instead in terms of light and dark and question marks; the good, the bad, the โ€œI donโ€™t quite understandโ€. And the โ€œI donโ€™t quite understandโ€ is not just the technical aspect, but more often elongated to โ€œI donโ€™t quite understand WHYโ€.

    Artfully speaking, the last time we had THIS kind of speed in progression was in the early 1960s. At the dawn of said decade it was decreed that guitar groups were on their way out, with no mention of any replacement. At this point, a โ€œguitar groupโ€ was thought of like The Shadows: an instrumental band, or a backing band for a singer. No one foresaw the idea of the singer/s being part of the band itself. Songwriters were odd-job men or classically trained surnames atop cheaply printed sheet music. Writers were writers, players were players, and singers were good-looking actors playing a part as the lead role. And then a group called The Beatles came on the scene. They wrote, they played, they sang. But they were repeatedly told โ€œguitar groups are on their way outโ€. What the system had not been able to comprehend was that this unknown group was the start of something new. The โ€œguitar groupโ€ as we now know it, was only just getting started. From 1963 to 1969 there were vast leaps just every few months. It was a true revolution in art, designed for the young, but quietly pricking the ears (and eyes) of the middle-aged (then thought to be anyone from the age of 28 to 50 – basically any possessor of a cardigan and a pipe).

    What we were witnessing, was young, brilliant, eager minds at work. As far as teenage fans were concerned, songs just happened. Back then (unlike in more recent years), people werenโ€™t familiar with or even aware of what went into making such records, for this was all behind closed doors. Studio doors. Interviews with band members – or as the stuffy old BBC would likely have called them: โ€œbannedโ€ members – very rarely had questions about the music itself and the whole process of making it. Instead, it was more โ€œSo how are you enjoying your tour of America?โ€, or โ€œDo you intend to grow your hair indefinitely?โ€. And yet, behind the scenes, the most magical movement was bubbling and blowing up. The writing was fresh and wild. The guitars were making sounds that compelled lab-coated engineers to frown and sweat. The singers were convincing microphones to contemplate suicide. Until the last few years, it seemed impossible to ever witness such a leap so great as the decade from 1959 to 1969. Yet here we are. The biggest artful leap in history has been during the last few years. I say โ€œartfulโ€ not in the correct sense of the word (clever and crafty), but more in a literal sense. And yet, these past few years have shown very little to do with actual art. Those years of โ€™63 to โ€™69 were vitally human. Which is exactly what the current climate is not.

    We keep being told by various tech CEOs that HAL removes the “laborious process” of making music, leaving us with a fully formed piece of music to listen to. There’s only one problem with this. Well, actually there are myriad problems, but let’s just deal with the one. That “laborious process” – spoken of like sticky detritus – IS the art. It is the everything that makes the final result have any point, purpose or worth. And so, inevitably there has been kickback. While I did expect this technical progression to be lightning speed, what I didn’t foresee was the speed and ferocity of said kickback. For some, itโ€™s an angry, deep-seated rebellion. A revolt against such sickenings that feel akin to betrayal. But for many, itโ€™s simply that they never changed. They ignored the masses and the hype, and just got on in their usual way; the only way they ever knew. HAL is ignored largely by older people; cast aside as a fad; a gimmick. Much in the same way many of these older artists observe social media; a cheap waste of time that has absolutely nothing to do with them. These artists are not trying to be trendy. Fashion has always been a young manโ€™s game (and so it should be). Being older has its own known drawbacks, but it does lend the benefit of authenticity. Interestingly, it hasnโ€™t always been this way. Back in the 60s, those young members of The Beatles and The Who were not following trends; they were inventing them. The older ones tended to do what they saw as being expected of them, rather than what felt right. And so, with this โ€œhave pen; will writeโ€ attitude, I feel quite content in being decidedly middle-aged. Yes, I can finally admit to myself that I am most definitely middle-aged. Sigh. Unless I live to the age of 104, in which case I still have another decade to hit the dreaded โ€œM.A.โ€ – โ€œStop it, CC; you are what you areโ€. Quite right.

    And hereโ€™s another artist who is what he is. Please welcome Robert Owen to the stage! Apologies for the slightly longer-than-usual pre-amble, but I thought in this case it was quite important to truly set the scene. Now, despite the name, Robert Owen is not British or even American. He is from Berlin. I have been quietly keeping my eye on him for a while. His music always intrigued me, but until now I always felt there was something somewhat incomplete about his releases. A disconnected sound, potentially intentional, but not quite to my taste. There was, however, always something about his sound that teased me. I think I was waiting for โ€œthe oneโ€. His latest single, โ€˜Rubber Mask of Holy Wrathโ€™ is, I believe, that one. And I further believe this song to be as far away from HAL as it is possible to be. HAL is good at copying the sound of real instruments. It is also good at copying mainstream sound. But it is not good at capturing the human mind. Probably because it does not know whatโ€™s coming. We are but weird souls. And when HAL does โ€œweirdโ€, it just misses the mark. I think the reason for this, is that it has never held a light bulb. While it might not be easy to work out if a song is HAL, it is definitely (at least so far) easy to tell if it is NOT made by HAL. And โ€˜Rubber Mask of Holy Wrathโ€™ is NOT made by HAL. While I have no doubt that HAL has its uses, generative HAL has no purpose in art that I can see, aside from fakery and dupery. When creating a piece of music and you wish for something to be a certain way, what better way than to do it manually? A true artist CANNOT rely on HAL to โ€œsave timeโ€ by doing it for the artist, unless we actually get to a point where HAL can read the artistโ€™s mindโ€ฆ But even then, where would be the fun in that?

    Speaking of an artistโ€™s mind, letโ€™s look at the mind of Robert Owen. His influences are both clear and unclear. Clear, because I can hear the essence of certain artists; but unclear, because the sound is simultaneously so disparate from those influences. A drop of vanilla essence makes a difference to the overall flavour, but does not make the dish taste of vanilla. I believe this is how influence should be, rather than simply being something from which to copy. HAL, take note. Actually, no. HAL, please do NOT take note; stay as you are. However, just to give you an idea of the sound, try and picture (in no particular order) The Beatles, 10cc, Joe Jackson, Peter Gabriel, Kaminski, Jeff Lynne, Sparks, Blur, Tears for Fears, McCartney, Alan Parsons, Madness, David Gilmour, Eno, and the minds of Bowie, Cave and Waits (but not necessarily the music). Then mix in some coldly organic electronica and the occasional strangely satisfying dissonance, and you might get halfway there. Much like last weekโ€™s CC pick, there is constant change in Robertโ€™s way of writing and producing. But unlike last weekโ€™s pick, this man is not even attempting to appeal to a mass audience. This goes beyond pop. For me, this is โ€œweirdโ€ done right. There is a forever sarcastic smile. Like Stravinsky and Picasso, one has to know the rules in order to break them. Going headfirst into โ€œweirdโ€ will usually end badly. Which probably explains why we tend to get the slightly older artists making the unusual material. The foundations and experience must be there in the first place in order to go further. Thatโ€™s how The Beatles were able to migrate from โ€˜She Loves Youโ€™ (Yeah, Yeah, Yeah), to โ€˜I Am The Walrusโ€™ (Goo-Goo Gโ€™Joob).

    A warning: โ€˜Rubber Mask of Holy Wrathโ€™ is not for those who suffer from the curse of the short attention span. Remember, Robert Owen is not trying to appeal to the Swifties. I suspect that he is not really trying to โ€œappealโ€ to ANYone. He is making the art that he needs to make. Should anyone wish to join him on his journey, theyโ€™re more than welcome – Iโ€™ll be on that train. The song is 8 and a half carriages long. Sorry, minutes. But peculiarly, it doesnโ€™t drag at any moment. And what I find a REAL joy is the lack of pretension that can so often be synonymous with this style of music (should this style be categorisable as a โ€œstyleโ€). I hesitate to call this a song, because it fits no usual verse-chorus-verse form; but as unusual as it stands, it still somehow remains a song. Length is a hindrance in this streaming world, because royalties are paid by the stream. Hence the main reason why we have shorter songs these days. If royalties were paid by the minute, I suspect that the world would have gone all Pink Floyd a long while ago; pretension intact. โ€˜Rubber Mask of Holy Wrathโ€™ is simply the length it wishes to be, while concentrating more on girth. This thing is full fat with a restrained belt of respect.

    What can I say about the music itself? The piano is heavy-handed after a false start. But this lumpen way of playing seems to impress upon us the confidence of its player, rather than show off the ivory amateur. It is very much intentional, this proud way of playing. Actually, while Iโ€™m here, nothing in this song is wispy. Everything is defined and calculated in that comically clichรฉ German way, yet nothing is ever robotic; itโ€™s simply efficient. Nothing is wasted, and everything is there for a reason. This is how a pro producer works. Like last weekโ€™s pick, the bass and drums are what keeps everything together within the superb mix. But I suppose what really brings me so close to this piece is the voice. Robert (who does everything except the backing vocals) has a voice that might seem like a friend to you. At least it does to me. And do bear in mind that I have never spoken with this chap in my life. I know almost nothing about him. For all I know, he might not exist and this is all HAL. In which case I might go the way of the above spittle-drenched microphones. But we have to take some things at face value, or we will all go insane. I would love to hear that Robert Owen is in fact the brother of Kaminski, but I highly doubt this will be the case. Letโ€™s briefly get back to the music. Robert knows how to control everything he has at his disposal, whether itโ€™s the use of a physical instrument, or the means to express the melody or sound in his mind through some sort of synthesiser. Nothing is over or underdone. As for those beautifully fresh, wide backing vocals, they are courtesy of Maria Maier, Stefanie Sagert and Heike Bollig. It feels to me like this song took quite a while to put together. More of a condensed opus than a song. But believe me, Robert, every effortโ€™s second was worth it. Itโ€™s the kind of astounding piece that would warrant a โ€œMaking Ofโ€ video.

    And then thereโ€™s the words!! Golly, theyโ€™re just absolutely- ah damn, weโ€™re all outta time. Youโ€™ll just have to listen for yourself.

    I wonder if 104 seems likelyโ€ฆ Wearing my cardigan, I glance at my pipe: โ€œNah, probably notโ€.

    Listen to ๐™๐™ช๐™—๐™—๐™š๐™ง ๐™ˆ๐™–๐™จ๐™  ๐™ค๐™› ๐™ƒ๐™ค๐™ก๐™ฎ ๐™’๐™ง๐™–๐™ฉ๐™ on the ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐˜†โ€™๐˜€ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ Spotify playlist HERE!

    Listen to ๐™๐™ช๐™—๐™—๐™š๐™ง ๐™ˆ๐™–๐™จ๐™  ๐™ค๐™› ๐™ƒ๐™ค๐™ก๐™ฎ ๐™’๐™ง๐™–๐™ฉ๐™ on the ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐˜†โ€™๐˜€ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ Apple Music playlist HERE!

    Watch ๐™๐™ช๐™—๐™—๐™š๐™ง ๐™ˆ๐™–๐™จ๐™  ๐™ค๐™› ๐™ƒ๐™ค๐™ก๐™ฎ ๐™’๐™ง๐™–๐™ฉ๐™ on YouTube HERE!

    Follow ๐™๐™ค๐™—๐™š๐™ง๐™ฉ ๐™Š๐™ฌ๐™š๐™ฃ on Instagram HERE!

    Follow ๐™๐™ค๐™—๐™š๐™ง๐™ฉ ๐™Š๐™ฌ๐™š๐™ฃ on TwiX HERE!

    Please share this post and let me know your thoughts in the comments below

  • ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐˜†โ€™๐˜€ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ – this week: Devilโ€™s Right Hand – Crash World

    ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐˜†โ€™๐˜€ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ – this week: Devilโ€™s Right Hand – Crash World

    Welcome all to ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐˜†โ€™๐˜€ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ, a series of weekly reviews by Charles Connolly – an artist in his own right. Here, Charles delves into the greatest brand new singles brought to you by the best unsigned artists on our electrifying and eclectic set of ๐™‰๐™š๐™ฌ ๐˜ผ๐™ง๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™จ๐™ฉ ๐™Ž๐™ฅ๐™ค๐™ฉ๐™ก๐™ž๐™œ๐™๐™ฉ playlists.

    ๐˜ฟ๐™š๐™ซ๐™ž๐™กโ€™๐™จ ๐™๐™ž๐™œ๐™๐™ฉ ๐™ƒ๐™–๐™ฃ๐™™ – ๐˜พ๐™ง๐™–๐™จ๐™ ๐™’๐™ค๐™ง๐™ก๐™™

    Charles spies with his little piesโ€ฆ

    Have you ever wondered if someone you know is perhaps not quite who they seem? Someone you have known a long time? Someone you feel you know well, yet at the same time you realise you know very little about them? Someone who perhaps has to disappear for brief bursts? They say itโ€™s business, yet youโ€™re never actually quite sure what it is they do, other than โ€œbusinessโ€. Does this ring a bell? Itโ€™s somewhat familiar to me. I know a chap who goes away regularly. Seemingly every few weeks. Actually, not seemingly; this happens. Heโ€™s always extremely busy, yet able to fit in anything that life hurls at him. If you want something done, ask a busy person – so the saying goes. Sure, he could simply be doing his job in โ€œbusinessโ€. Sure, he might simply not be interested in talking about said โ€œbusinessโ€โ€ฆ But I canโ€™t help but wonderโ€ฆ

    Wonder about the ins and outs of his business? No, no, no. Thatโ€™s deadly dull, and Iโ€™m not remotely interested. I canโ€™t help but wonder if this โ€œbusinessโ€ is a usual sort of business. You see, I have a somewhat overactive imagination (it makes life more interesting). Iโ€™m also natural inquisitive, and (unfortunately) naturally suspicious. Okay, letโ€™s just say what I mean. I think my friend might a spy. This is based entirely on precisely zero. There is pretty much no reason why I should be thinking this. Perhaps itโ€™s just me trying to make life a little less dull; who knows. Perhaps itโ€™s because I quite like the idea of knowing James Bond. But then again, there is always the chance I am right. Yes, itโ€™s doubtful, but it could very well be true. I will probably never know. Should he actually be a spy, I should hope heโ€™s on the right side. It would crush me to discover that not only had he been a spy for all these years without mentioning a word of it (heโ€™d be a rubbish spy if he had), but that he had been working for the โ€œother sideโ€. Only just very recently have I learnt that the chap is moving. He and his family are going to live in a faraway land. A place with an entirely different culture and way of life. And it was THIS that confirmed my suspicions (without actually confirming a damned thing). He told me in person, over a pie. Suspicious, no? A pie is smart, neat and nonchalant on the outside, yet filled with secrets. Had my friend been a pie all these years?

    So, this pie of mine. I went into my novelistic mind as I imagined him crossing that border; something he does frequently. The difference being, this pie had always returned. Not this time. I gather it is to be for roughly two years – I assume the length of the โ€œTop Secret operationโ€. Once he arrives there, he will be a new man. A man with no past. A man with no acquaintances. He will be welcomed as a โ€œman of businessโ€, not a โ€œpie of businessโ€, for to them he has no secrets. There, he will seem much as he had seemed here. Just a businessman going about his duties. And yet, still, I canโ€™t help but wonder. Is he sharing secrets? Is he secretly filming at all times through his electronic glasses? Is he taking coded notes? Is he seen to enter a cafรฉ at 1pm, only to leave at 6pm through the back door? But then I wonder about something else. He is my friend, you seeโ€ฆ I wonder if he is safe? I also wonder if he is armedโ€ฆ! But then I start to wonder furtherโ€ฆ IS he my friend? Does his family actually exist? Is everything simply an illusion formed from a manner and what I have been told? Or am I just unhealthily suspicious, bordering on paranoid? I suspect I am simply using my powers of observation and imagination, blending the two to best feed my creative compulsion. My pie is probably not a pie, and instead as blatant as a roast beef dinner. What you see is what you get.

    On the subject of pies- sorry: spies; allow me to welcome you to something refreshing in all ways. The song is โ€˜Devilโ€™s Right Handโ€™. The artist is a duo called Crash World. They have never appeared here before, despite having released some excellent songs over the years. These two Vancouverites (or Vancouverians, as I like to say – pronounced Van-koo-VAIR-ee-ans) both have Scottish roots. Although a duo, these two make sure to hire other musicians as well for the recordings, so it does still sound like a full band, rather than an acoustic duo. I have always gone for their music; mainly because they take it seriously. Some artists make music that sounds like a casual afterthought. Something that occurs briefly while theyโ€™re stirring their tea. But to make something really worth listening to, one has to put in the time and effort. The days of the repeated-four-chord-sequence must surely die soon. The lyrics that slumber without so much as a turn from night to morn. The predictability that bears the question: โ€œWhat for?โ€โ€ฆ I like artists who show their worth. Artists who challenge themselves. Artists who bother. Artists who genuinely know how to make great music, through their own years of experience. And this is just where Crash World comes in. These two Scottish Canadians have a certain confidence in their sound and manner that doesnโ€™t come close to arrogance. Itโ€™s more like โ€œWhat, you mean YOU canโ€™t do this? I thought we ALL couldโ€. When something is so natural to you, it seems impossible that anyone else might struggle with it.

    These two eccentric lads are Glen MacLeod and Graham MacDonald. Glen is the writer, guitarist and also does backing vocals. Heโ€™s the one with the style. Graham is the voice of the band. Heโ€™s the one with the weighty backbone. I suppose in a way, Glen is the Paul, and Graham is the Lennon. To be fair, both Glen and Graham are not only eccentric, but both very stylish. They both look inherently cool. Whether it be Glenโ€™s facial hair (imagine if Salvador Dalรญ had opted for a beard), bowler hat, black suit, black shirt and white tie, or Grahamโ€™s heavyset, imposing stature, snazzy Las Vegas jackets and sporting what seems like a colourful yet flattened hedgehog atop his otherwise shaven noggin, the name of the game is style. And a style of their own. But putting all this aside, itโ€™s the music that brings them together (or at least keeps them together). And itโ€™s the music that lured me in. Despite the subject matter being frankly fascinating, I must admit it was the music that initially tugged at my elbow, yelling โ€œPick Me! PICK ME!โ€. And so I did it pick it. Of course, the pro sound made the experience pleasing and more enticing than some other releases, but it was the songwriting that kept me listening. As to the lyrical theme of the song, itโ€™s about the idea of a spy in a foreign land, from the spyโ€™s perspective. And yes, this spy is seemingly working for the other side. I donโ€™t know if I have ever heard a song about that!! Just SO refreshing.

    But what else is refreshingโ€ฆ? The music. How itโ€™s written the way songs USED to be written. Sections within sections, lines leading to other lines, one chord setting up a new chord, unexpected constant change, but never feeling awkward or jazzy. Most songs these days feel like a triangle: walk for one mile, turn left, walk for one mile, turn left, walk for one mile – congratulations, itโ€™s over. Whereโ€™s the JOURNEY?! It should feel like a train trip through the Scottish Highlands, not a flight from London to New York. Hereโ€™s a load of timestamps for ya: 0:00, 0:05, 0:10, 0:15, 0:26, 0:33โ€ฆ Just over 30 seconds in, and we have already had all these surprises. Fast forward to 1:00 and we get 1:10, 1:21, 1:26 – itโ€™s just constant change. This is what songwriting was always supposed to be. Not just four chords ad infinitum. Music is supposed to evolve, not repeat. Sure, we need the hooks to repeat through the course of the song, but it shouldnโ€™t be possible to condense a whole song into 20 seconds without missing loads out. So, yeah, thatโ€™s the writing side of things – itโ€™s exquisite, and it frankly kinda gives me hope for the future of music. As to the singing and the playingโ€ฆ Phwoah! Graham has just one job here: singing. Boy, he belts like caramel. At first I was thinking he sounded like a Texan Bryan Ferry, but then I realised heโ€™s actually more like Elvis – as he might have been had he lived through the 80s, and eaten fewer peanut butter, banana and bacon sandwiches (I still shudder every time I hear that concoction). As to the instruments, theyโ€™re sublimely played. Glen has already been busy with the writing, but his layers of guitars are session-man-good, with a couple of cracking little solos in the second half. But what really grabs me in the instrumentation is the bass and drums. The drums will be more obvious to you, but do try to pay attention to the bass. Much of the time it is neatly bold in the low end, but other times it has the most fabulously nosy manner! Itโ€™s like an eager garden mammal when faced with the prospect of just so many nuts ripe for the picking. Yup, thatโ€™s how Iโ€™ll end this piece.

    That garden mammal is full, and so am I. Look, I started with a pie, and finished with two Big Macs.

    Listen to ๐˜ฟ๐™š๐™ซ๐™ž๐™กโ€™๐™จ ๐™๐™ž๐™œ๐™๐™ฉ ๐™ƒ๐™–๐™ฃ๐™™ on the Connollyโ€™s Corner Spotify playlist HERE!

    Listen to ๐˜ฟ๐™š๐™ซ๐™ž๐™กโ€™๐™จ ๐™๐™ž๐™œ๐™๐™ฉ ๐™ƒ๐™–๐™ฃ๐™™ on the Connollyโ€™s Corner Apple Music playlist HERE!

    Listen to ๐˜ฟ๐™š๐™ซ๐™ž๐™กโ€™๐™จ ๐™๐™ž๐™œ๐™๐™ฉ ๐™ƒ๐™–๐™ฃ๐™™ on YouTube HERE!

    Follow ๐˜พ๐™ง๐™–๐™จ๐™ ๐™’๐™ค๐™ง๐™ก๐™™ on Instagram HERE!

    Follow ๐˜พ๐™ง๐™–๐™จ๐™ ๐™’๐™ค๐™ง๐™ก๐™™ on TwiX HERE!

    Please share this post and let me know your thoughts in the comments below

  • ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐˜†โ€™๐˜€ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ – this week: Heroes Let You Down – Bryan Cooper

    ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐˜†โ€™๐˜€ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ – this week: Heroes Let You Down – Bryan Cooper

    Welcome all to ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐˜†โ€™๐˜€ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ, a series of weekly reviews by Charles Connolly – an artist in his own right. Here, Charles delves into the greatest brand new singles brought to you by the best unsigned artists on our electrifying and eclectic set of ๐™‰๐™š๐™ฌ ๐˜ผ๐™ง๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™จ๐™ฉ ๐™Ž๐™ฅ๐™ค๐™ฉ๐™ก๐™ž๐™œ๐™๐™ฉ playlists.

    ๐™ƒ๐™š๐™ง๐™ค๐™š๐™จ ๐™‡๐™š๐™ฉ ๐™”๐™ค๐™ช ๐˜ฟ๐™ค๐™ฌ๐™ฃ – ๐˜ฝ๐™ง๐™ฎ๐™–๐™ฃ ๐˜พ๐™ค๐™ค๐™ฅ๐™š๐™ง

    Charles goes from hero to zeroโ€ฆ

    To say โ€œWe are all heroesโ€ would be a very positive, modern way of making us all feel good about ourselves. It would also be a conscious lie. While many of us might be doing very well in life, we canโ€™t all be heroes, or the word loses meaning and status. We must however all HAVE heroes. It is important to have someone to admire. This is mainly for two reasons. One, because we all need aspiration; we need to strive. And two, with no one above you, your ego will spiral out of control. So, those heroes really need to be solid. They need to be impossibly perfect. Choose wisely! We want a flawless glaze, not chipped china.

    How, then, do we find such a โ€œheroโ€? Weโ€™re all a bit rubbishโ€ฆ We ARE human, after all. We are fallible in so many ways. We do the wrong thing from time to time. But does this make us inherently bad people? Well, that all depends on intention and awareness. Being unreliable due to having ADHD does not make you a bad person. But being unreliable because you donโ€™t care, perhaps makes you a selfish person (not necessarily โ€œbadโ€, but itโ€™s edging that way). So, when choosing a hero (we rarely consciously โ€œchooseโ€; it just happens), we need to find the person or people with the least flaws. But even then, it can be difficult. Say youโ€™re a businessman and you look up to Jeff Bezos or Elon Musk, it ainโ€™t because theyโ€™re kind, lovely people, but because they are absolutely superb at business (whatever their methods). And letโ€™s face it, aside from โ€œmy mumโ€ (oh come on) or โ€œmy dadโ€ (youโ€™re just saying that), most peopleโ€™s heroes are celebrities. Sorry, whatโ€™s that? Apparently the phone lines have lit up due to complaints about the previous parental comment. Okay, youโ€™re quite right. I very much look up to both of mine. I just feel like a hero should be disconnected and untouchable. A bit like a god. So when one of those parentals asks me why all their emails have disappeared, itโ€™s not quite the god I had in mind. I do however wholeheartedly apologise for any distress my previous comment might have caused (I believe thatโ€™s the standard plastic response weโ€™re meant to use these days).

    With most of us being artists, our heroes will probably be famous artists. It stands to reason. However, in art there is always this difficult balance of art versus artist. While the art may remain pure, it can be tainted within our minds because of the artistโ€™s personality or even wrongdoing. Yes, I have touched on this before, but in this increasingly scandal-driven society, it seems more and more pertinent. When connecting with an artistโ€™s art, we tend to connect with the artist. I completely understand that it is hard to love the creation if you despise the creator. But why? Why do we automatically associate one with the other? We all know Picassoโ€™s work, but because he lived a little while ago, you probably donโ€™t know much (if anything) about the artist, so the personality becomes irrelevant and we concentrate solely on the art itself. Which is brilliant. These days, though, I wonder if he would survive the inevitable chastisement for his hot and cold adulterous behaviour. In this present climate, being a celebrity is a VERY dangerous game, it seems. Can you imagine being surrounded by suspicious eyes hunting for flaws? Can you imagine the hateful judgement around every corner? Some celebrities are almost ousted from society for not smiling when greeted by a fan. Other celebrities are hated for wanting to change the colour of their roof. But then there are the genuinely bad celebrities. The ones who have committed horrific crimes. This is where things really do get serious. How can you continue to love and admire someone who is a convicted rapist? This heinous felony is no error of judgement. No mistake. No โ€œwhoops, I made a boo-booโ€. And yet, their art remains innocent. THIS is the problem. We feel let down. And itโ€™s a CRYING SHAME!!!

    One such rapist is an artist called Br-โ€ฆ PHONE LINES!!!! Whoops, I made a boo-boo. I wholeheartedly apologise for such a joke in incredibly poor taste. Or whatever. Oh, the joys of NOT being a celebrity. Bryan Cooper is a good friend and a fabulous musician. He is also fully equipped with a wonderful, dry, English sense of humour; something he took with him when migrating from chipped china to judicious Japan. Weโ€™ll get to my pick of the week (โ€˜Heroes Let You Downโ€™) in a bit. First, though, letโ€™s step back and have a look at the bigger picture. You see, this is not just an isolated song release. And neither is it even a new song. It is a remastered version of a single from 2022, as part of a compilation. This album is the release. Once I had spotted its existence on Thursday, I assumed it was the complete collected works of Bryan Cooper thus far. After further delving, I realised it was only 11 of his previous 20 released songs – so by no means the complete collected works, but the SELected works of Bryan Cooper. I kind of wish it had been called โ€˜Natural Selectionโ€™, but then again heโ€™d have the crows chewing on his shoulder. Going by his choices, I would say it is less a โ€œbest ofโ€, and more just simply โ€œmusings on a themeโ€ – musically they are of the same ilk. So, although a compilation, it still โ€œreadsโ€ like an album. Which I like. Mini review of the album (โ€˜Transmission Coda: Selected Works 2022-2026โ€™)โ€ฆ? โ€œBloody brilliant from beginning to end. Just supoyb. Go (and) listen!โ€. Now letโ€™s get to the song at hand.

    โ€˜Heroes Let You Downโ€™; the title is not a question, but a statement. Which did interest me. It suggests the inevitable, rather than the potential. There are various ways of looking at the songโ€™s meaning. There is, of course, the way I stated above. But then there is the rather more manipulative way, which seems to be more how Bryan means. How the stars are portrayed, versus how they actually are. This is not a new concept by any means; look at 1950s Hollywood: the impossible dreamโ€ฆ In Bryanโ€™s own lyric, he seizes that vital word: โ€œPropagandaโ€. But this conspiracy theory isnโ€™t just related to artists. This could be about a politician, a business entrepreneur or a member of the Royal Family… But then again, letโ€™s just suppose it IS about an artist. Weโ€™ve all been there. The artist you have adored since age 11. You had all their records, you had the posters, you went to see them live several times. You even posed in the mirror doing impressions of them! I see those red cheeks of yours. Then years later, you find that the whole industry has known bad things about them for such a long time, but for the sake of money and scandal theyโ€™d chosen to keep those secrets locked up, until even the big boys could no longer contain the horrible truth. My question has always been this. Should we dump the art with the artist? That art is still the same art it was when you loved the artist. It makes me think of when a murdererโ€™s home is demolished because it belonged to that murderer. Surely the house wasnโ€™t in on itโ€ฆ Are people that superstitious? Or is it just an association that is impossible to shakeโ€ฆ? Probably. Which is so sad. Innocent art made by guilty creatures.

    Thankfully, here we get both sainted art and saintly artist. The best of both worlds. One of the disadvantages of Bryan being such a great songwriter, is that it can detract from his brilliance as a guitarist. One is so absorbed in the music, that itโ€™s often easy to gloss over the playing itself. And thatโ€™s how this song begins. A guitar melody that sounds as though this axe is just another limb. Itโ€™s as though his fingers are singing. His technique was never learnt but simply there. Much like we never learnt how to feel. This is all amplified by relentless yet subtle bending of the pitch, as well as the layers of manipulated guitar underneath. Simply put, this man knows his tools. But the song is underway with bass and drums soon enough. It is all setup for the confident, heavenly vocals, 28 seconds in. Even these have been layered for texture. Such a personal voice, but it knows youโ€™re listening. Itโ€™s not personal like a soft, private conversation you were privy to through crossed wires. Itโ€™s more like a captivating performance by the only trustworthy candidate. After several verse/chorus type things (itโ€™s never quite as simple as the norm with Bryan), we hit the masterful guitar section at 1:05, which continues for about 30 seconds. Itโ€™s like a demonstration on how to flick. The most unique way of playing. The only guitarist who plays even close to this style, is Graham Coxon. But what I find captivating is just how many notes Bryan is able to fit in, while never coming close to sounding annoying, show-offy, or jazzy. It always just works, and it sounds as natural as playing a slow major scale. I feel like the guitar is his closest friend. Every flick is like a ruffling a dogโ€™s submental region. No, thatโ€™s not what you think it is. Oh look, just listen. And while youโ€™re at it, set aside the 32 minutes it will take to listen to the whole LP.

    If youโ€™re currently looking for a new hero, I might strongly suggest Bryan Cooper. Thereโ€™s enough disconnection, heโ€™s kind and honest, heโ€™s never made a bad record, and he knows how to use his email. He wonโ€™t EVER let you down.

    Righto, I now have to recover my godโ€™s emails, despite having an itchy submental region. PHONE LINES!!!

    Listen to ๐™ƒ๐™š๐™ง๐™ค๐™š๐™จ ๐™‡๐™š๐™ฉ ๐™”๐™ค๐™ช ๐˜ฟ๐™ค๐™ฌ๐™ฃ on the ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐˜†โ€™๐˜€ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ Spotify playlist HERE!

    Listen to ๐™ƒ๐™š๐™ง๐™ค๐™š๐™จ ๐™‡๐™š๐™ฉ ๐™”๐™ค๐™ช ๐˜ฟ๐™ค๐™ฌ๐™ฃ on the ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐˜†โ€™๐˜€ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ Apple Music playlist HERE!

    Watch ๐™ƒ๐™š๐™ง๐™ค๐™š๐™จ ๐™‡๐™š๐™ฉ ๐™”๐™ค๐™ช ๐˜ฟ๐™ค๐™ฌ๐™ฃ on YouTube HERE!

    Listen to the ๐™๐™ง๐™–๐™ฃ๐™จ๐™ข๐™ž๐™จ๐™จ๐™ž๐™ค๐™ฃ ๐˜พ๐™ค๐™™๐™–: ๐™Ž๐™š๐™ก๐™š๐™˜๐™ฉ๐™š๐™™ ๐™’๐™ค๐™ง๐™ ๐™จ 2022-2026 LP on Spotify HERE!

    Listen to the ๐™๐™ง๐™–๐™ฃ๐™จ๐™ข๐™ž๐™จ๐™จ๐™ž๐™ค๐™ฃ ๐˜พ๐™ค๐™™๐™–: ๐™Ž๐™š๐™ก๐™š๐™˜๐™ฉ๐™š๐™™ ๐™’๐™ค๐™ง๐™ ๐™จ 2022-2026 LP on Apple Music HERE!

    Listen to the ๐™๐™ง๐™–๐™ฃ๐™จ๐™ข๐™ž๐™จ๐™จ๐™ž๐™ค๐™ฃ ๐˜พ๐™ค๐™™๐™–: ๐™Ž๐™š๐™ก๐™š๐™˜๐™ฉ๐™š๐™™ ๐™’๐™ค๐™ง๐™ ๐™จ 2022-2026 LP on YouTube HERE!

    Follow ๐˜ฝ๐™ง๐™ฎ๐™–๐™ฃ ๐˜พ๐™ค๐™ค๐™ฅ๐™š๐™ง on Instagram HERE!

    Follow ๐˜ฝ๐™ง๐™ฎ๐™–๐™ฃ ๐˜พ๐™ค๐™ค๐™ฅ๐™š๐™ง on TwiX HERE!

    Please share this post and let me know your thoughts in the comments below

  • ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐˜†โ€™๐˜€ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ – this week: The Dark Days – Jasmine Catherine

    ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐˜†โ€™๐˜€ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ – this week: The Dark Days – Jasmine Catherine

    Welcome all to ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐˜†โ€™๐˜€ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ, a series of weekly reviews by Charles Connolly – an artist in his own right. Here, Charles delves into the greatest brand new singles brought to you by the best unsigned artists on our electrifying and eclectic set of ๐™‰๐™š๐™ฌ ๐˜ผ๐™ง๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™จ๐™ฉ ๐™Ž๐™ฅ๐™ค๐™ฉ๐™ก๐™ž๐™œ๐™๐™ฉ playlists.

    ๐™๐™๐™š ๐˜ฟ๐™–๐™ง๐™  ๐˜ฟ๐™–๐™ฎ๐™จ – ๐™…๐™–๐™จ๐™ข๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™š ๐˜พ๐™–๐™ฉ๐™๐™š๐™ง๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™š

    Charles commands his audienceโ€ฆ

    โ€œAll the worldโ€™s a stage, And all the men and women merely playersโ€. Wise words from The Bard. I think more so than ever, we take this literally. Life has become a theatre. While we used to warm to the comforts of tradition and still calm (the predictable status quo), these days we seem to crave unexpected newness; whether it be desirable or not. We are glued to our screens when horror strikes. But another way we seem literally to treat life as theatre, is the way so many of us act so naturally to the camera. We speak to its lens like a close friend. We exaggerate movements and expressions in order to garner views and comments. We need the rapturous applause! Basically, we are anything but content behind all the content. Monotony is no longer meditative, but an unliveable torture, as if you have been told โ€œNo more heroin for YOU, little miss missyโ€โ€ฆ

    For me, very little in this world is more exciting than art. Art is what humans create for humans to enjoy. It is a connection and a bond between us all. Nature is fab and all, but we canโ€™t quite have the same respect and awe as when it is created by we mere mortals. With nature, it just happens, no matter how incredible and beautiful it is. Great art is more than the art itself. It is the expression of man. The skill of man. The experience of man. The ingenuity and originality of man. Yes, of woman as well (obvs.). Soโ€ฆ Why is it that so much art these days is so dull and so tedious? Within the last couple of years we have watched HAL (A.I.) copy humans. But in more recent times, I have noticed something quite frightening. More so, I mean. Humans seem to be sounding more and more like HAL. It is as if we are copying the copy. But the original copy was already inferior and quite plastic. So what we end up with (in the copy of the copy) is something so utterly predictable and frankly pointless, yet still created by man. It is like we are making art for the sake of making art. โ€œArt for artโ€™s sake (money, for Godโ€™s sake)โ€ – thank you, 10cc. Are we to go on in this manner? To plonk another piece on the pile so as to make it tallerโ€ฆ?

    I think somewhere down the line we lost something. Despite us all being actors these days, we seem to have misplaced the theatre. The audience is ready and willing (can you hear them chanting from the auditorium?), and yet there is no stage. The good news is, this isnโ€™t universally true. We still have pockets. Few, but deep. Shall we look at the theatre of music? No, I donโ€™t mean musical theatre. I mean theatrical music. Weโ€™ll gloss over the 1950s because the only theatre we got was gyrating hips set to 3 chords. The 1960s brought us The Who, The Doors and Pink Floyd (the early days with Syd Barrett). Even without seeing these acts, the music was definitively theatrical, exciting and fuelled by drugs. The 1970s was really the most theatrical decade of relatively recent times. Even normal people were sporting platform shoes, flares, sideburns (less so the women) and any manner of flamboyant wear. And in music, we had Queen, 10cc, Kiss and David Bowie. Does it get more theatrical than these acts? The 1980s realised ways of bringing theatre into true pop music: Toto, Michael Jackson, Kate Bush and Prince. The 1990s decided that anything could be mainstream, as long as it was new and magnificent; cue Bjรถrk, Blur and Slipknot. The 2000s saw a return to the classic days of theatre in music: Muse, Lady Gaga and Rufus Wainwright. Now, the 2010s is where it all gets a little tricky. This is when things started to go a little plastic and sterileโ€ฆ We canโ€™t blame HAL for EVERYthingโ€ฆ There were still a few excellent theatrical music acts, though: London Grammar, The Dear Hunter and Benjamin Clementine. But we had such hope for the 2020s. That we might resume the magic of music; but HAL ruined that. The good news is, the human excitement is genuinely coming back. It started with Billie Eilish, but latterly we rely on acts that arenโ€™t strictly โ€œpopโ€: Wolf Alice, Jacob Collier, The Last Dinner Party, and RAYE. Of course, youโ€™re all screaming and shouting that I missed out โ€œthisโ€ and I missed out โ€œthatโ€. There will be TONNES of ones Iโ€™ve missed out. But Iโ€™m not the Encyclopaedia Britannica (or the theatrical equivalent: Wikipedia).

    RAYE is the one that really made me think about all of this. Her latest album is an absolutely staggering feat, rocking the mainstream world, hopefully worrying the likes of Ed Sheeran etc.. Isnโ€™t it lovely that Ed Sheeran is FINALLY out of favour? ENOUGH of the deadly dull. OUT with the utterly predictable!! RAYE managed something of all eras, yet somehow wholly modern. I really hope this makes the mainstream try a little harder, but not COPY HER!!! We need exciting originality. I crave it constantly since you took away my heroin. Thankfully, this love of theatrical resonance is here in the independent world. Not in abundance by any means, but there are smatterings of it hither and thither. One such smattering was delivered to my ears many months ago. Last year, in fact. An artist I have been quietly following from last year to this day. Every release simply different from what we usually hear on various playlists. And I donโ€™t mean itโ€™s just full of weirdness and dissonance. Thereโ€™s plenty of that, but not here. I am speaking of the English rose, Jasmine Catherine. She has a history of actual musical theatre and is classically trained to boot! She must therefore be rather good at booting. Every single one of Jasmineโ€™s releases is theatrical to the extent that each could be included in a Lord of the Rings film. Some have said Disney, but I think itโ€™s rather more sophisticated than this. I sort of think of it as opera for the modern pop ear.

    This is โ€˜The Dark Daysโ€™, released in October of last year. Of course, she has had several releases since, but I thought this particular one would be a good introduction for you all to understand what it is that Jasmine Catherine creates. Have you heard of her? Perhaps not. Should you have done? Absolutely. Hence THIS. I called her the English rose because she is from England, but not just because of that. Her features are pure, with long, naturally red hair, bright blue eyes, and the kind of skin that screams โ€œsun, be GONE!!โ€. Her speaking voice is just the kind of English accent we all hear in Harry Potter and Hugh Grant films, but rarely in real life. With this voice she even reads audiobooks! She is obsessed with fairytale and fantasy. She does not scroll at 2am. She reads at 2am. She seems to have two obsessions: reading and making music. Jasmine is of a mythical past. But from this idyllic era, let us turn to โ€˜The Dark Daysโ€™.

    The piece (I canโ€™t quite call it a song) is unique. In a way it is classically filmic, but in other ways it is somehow modern. Vocally, there are similarities in fellow indie artist Jessica Mia (singer for Jane Marieโ€™s songs), but I think one sings differently when the piece is self-written. It is nearly impossible to compare this piece to any other artist, because of how original it is. But if I had to, I would mention London Grammar, Wolf Alice and The Last Dinner Party in terms of voice, Kate Bush in terms of daring, and RAYE in terms of being able to blend musical theatre with something more accessible and altogether cool. I am beyond impressed with the sophistication of the writing and arrangement. Very adulty, yet so youthful. The backing vocals also have a teensy-weensy bit of Billie Eilish. What astounds me about โ€˜The Dark Daysโ€™ is how it is less than four and a half minutes. Too much happens in such a brief amount of time. And yet, the whole piece takes its time. This isnโ€™t by any means some sort of frenetic jazz nutcase of a piece. It is ultimately beautifully classical, but the writing and production take it places you just werenโ€™t expecting. Take, for example, the opening distant violin ostinato (which is absolutely perfect)โ€ฆ It could go anywhere from here, but alongside Jasmineโ€™s initial line, there is something very dark indeed. At first I thought it was a bass trombone, but within seconds I realised it was perfectly following her vocal melody. More than the melody, in fact. It is – I believe – her very vocal recording, pitched down by two octaves. Itโ€™s just NOT what you would expect to hear from ANYone! Then just as you have settled into the current climate, the weather changes (such is the way in England). Jasmine sings the line โ€œAnd you ask yourself, are these the dark days?โ€, and there is a pause. Up to this point, the voice is coated in a soft but lush hall reverb, but at the point of โ€œdaysโ€, it is switched off – reminding you that we can do anything in the 21st century, and that all is not perhaps as it might seem. The orchestra ensues, complete with deep strings (both bowed and plucked), timpani, tubular bells, and a choir. This violin ostinato (played by Adrian de Lima) runs through most of the piece for momentum. From this moment the production (by Nicole Gisbourne) sets sail, and from this moment, the unstoppable sea crashes on, despite numerous obstacles. I could of course go into SO much more detail, but I understand, you all have things to do. At least make sure that one of those things is pressing play. And if you still have a bit of time, make sure to catch up on ALL 9 of her releases so far. Iโ€™m very much looking forward to Jasmine sealing them all together in a neat little LP – if she chooses to do that.

    And now the curtain falls to close
    The story of an English rose
    With English eyes and English nose
    I hope you liked my English prose

    Listen to ๐™๐™๐™š ๐˜ฟ๐™–๐™ง๐™  ๐˜ฟ๐™–๐™ฎ๐™จ on the ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐˜†โ€™๐˜€ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ Spotify playlist HERE!

    Listen to ๐™๐™๐™š ๐˜ฟ๐™–๐™ง๐™  ๐˜ฟ๐™–๐™ฎ๐™จ on the ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐˜†โ€™๐˜€ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ Apple Music playlist HERE!

    Watch ๐™๐™๐™š ๐˜ฟ๐™–๐™ง๐™  ๐˜ฟ๐™–๐™ฎ๐™จ on YouTube HERE!

    Follow ๐™…๐™–๐™จ๐™ข๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™š ๐˜พ๐™–๐™ฉ๐™๐™š๐™ง๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™š on Instagram HERE!

    Please share this post and let me know your thoughts in the comments below